Reply to Burgess et al: Catastrophic climate risks are neglected, plausible, and safe to study

Abstract
Description
Keywords
carbon footprint, climate change, climate change mitigation, disaster response, environmental impact, environmental policy, environmental temperature, greenhouse effect, human, human impact (environment), Letter, mental health, misinformation, risk assessment, risk management, climate
Citation
Kemp, L., Xu, C., Depledge, J., Ebi, K. L., Gibbins, G., Kohler, T. A., et al. (2022). Reply to Burgess et al: Catastrophic climate risks are neglected, plausible, and safe to study. 119(42). https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.2214884119
Collections
License
CC BY 4.0 Unported