Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through trade

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage1641eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue5eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleHydrology and Earth System Scienceseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume15eng
dc.contributor.authorFader, M.
dc.contributor.authorGerten, D.
dc.contributor.authorThammer, M.
dc.contributor.authorHeinke, J.
dc.contributor.authorLotze-Campen, H.
dc.contributor.authorLucht, W.
dc.contributor.authorCramer, W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-03T06:36:50Z
dc.date.available2020-08-03T06:36:50Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThe need to increase food production for a growing world population makes an assessment of global agricultural water productivities and virtual water flows important. Using the hydrology and agro-biosphere model LPJmL, we quantify at 0.5° resolution the amount of blue and green water (irrigation and precipitation water) needed to produce one unit of crop yield, for 11 of the world's major crop types. Based on these, we also quantify the agricultural water footprints (WFP) of all countries, for the period 1998-2002, distinguishing internal and external WFP (virtual water imported from other countries) and their blue and green components, respectively. Moreover, we calculate water savings and losses, and for the first time also land savings and losses, through international trade with these products. The consistent separation of blue and green water flows and footprints shows that green water globally dominates both the internal and external WFP (84 % of the global WFP and 94 % of the external WFP rely on green water). While no country ranks among the top ten with respect to all water footprints calculated here, Pakistan and Iran demonstrate high absolute and per capita blue WFP, and the US and India demonstrate high absolute green and blue WFPs. The external WFPs are relatively small (6 % of the total global blue WFP, 16 % of the total global green WFP). Nevertheless, current trade of the products considered here saves significant water volumes and land areas (∼263 km3 and ∼41 Mha, respectively, equivalent to 5 % of the sowing area of the considered crops and 3.5 % of the annual precipitation on this area). Relating the proportions of external to internal blue/green WFP to the per capita WFPs allows recognizing that only a few countries consume more water from abroad than from their own territory and have at the same time above-average WFPs. Thus, countries with high per capita water consumption affect mainly the water availability in their own country. Finally, this study finds that flows/savings of both virtual water and virtual land need to be analysed together, since they are intrinsically related.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/5323
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/3952
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherChichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltdeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1641-2011
dc.relation.issn1027-5606
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.subject.otherAgricultural watereng
dc.subject.otherAnnual precipitationeng
dc.subject.otherCrop yieldeng
dc.subject.otherFood productioneng
dc.subject.otherGreen componenteng
dc.subject.otherGreen watereng
dc.subject.otherGreen water floweng
dc.subject.otherLand areaseng
dc.subject.otherPakistaneng
dc.subject.otherPer capitaeng
dc.subject.otherVirtual watereng
dc.subject.otherVirtual water-floweng
dc.subject.otherWater availabilityeng
dc.subject.otherWater consumptioneng
dc.subject.otherWater footprinteng
dc.subject.otherWater savingeng
dc.subject.otherWater volumeseng
dc.subject.otherWorld populationeng
dc.subject.otherFlow of watereng
dc.subject.otherHydraulicseng
dc.subject.otherInternational tradeeng
dc.subject.otherWater supplyeng
dc.subject.otherCropseng
dc.subject.otheragricultural modelingeng
dc.subject.othercrop productioneng
dc.subject.othercrop yieldeng
dc.subject.otherfood productioneng
dc.subject.otherinternational tradeeng
dc.subject.otherland managementeng
dc.subject.otherwater availabilityeng
dc.subject.otherwater floweng
dc.subject.otherwater footprinteng
dc.subject.otherIndiaeng
dc.subject.otherIraneng
dc.subject.otherPakistaneng
dc.subject.otherUnited Stateseng
dc.titleInternal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through tradeeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fader et al 2011, Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: