Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects in Minipigs with Zonal Chondrocyte/Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Constructs

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage653eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleInternational journal of molecular scienceseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume20eng
dc.contributor.authorBothe, Friederike
dc.contributor.authorDeubel, Anne-Kathrin
dc.contributor.authorHesse, Eliane
dc.contributor.authorLotz, Benedict
dc.contributor.authorGroll, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Wiltrud
dc.contributor.authorHagmann, Sebastien
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-04T08:28:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-04T08:28:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractDespite advances in cartilage repair strategies, treatment of focal chondral lesions remains an important challenge to prevent osteoarthritis. Articular cartilage is organized into several layers and lack of zonal organization of current grafts is held responsible for insufficient biomechanical and biochemical quality of repair-tissue. The aim was to develop a zonal approach for cartilage regeneration to determine whether the outcome can be improved compared to a non-zonal strategy. Hydrogel-filled polycaprolactone (PCL)-constructs with a chondrocyte-seeded upper-layer deemed to induce hyaline cartilage and a mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-containing bottom-layer deemed to induce calcified cartilage were compared to chondrocyte-based non-zonal grafts in a minipig model. Grafts showed comparable hardness at implantation and did not cause visible signs of inflammation. After 6 months, X-ray microtomography (_CT)-analysis revealed significant bone-loss in both treatment groups compared to empty controls. PCL-enforcement and some hydrogel-remnants were retained in all defects, but most implants were pressed into the subchondral bone. Despite important heterogeneities, both treatments reached a significantly lower modified O’Driscoll-score compared to empty controls. Thus, PCL may have induced bone-erosion during joint loading and misplacement of grafts in vivo precluding adequate permanent orientation of zones compared to surrounding native cartilage. © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7173
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6220
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBasel : Molecular Diversity Preservation Internationaleng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030653
dc.relation.essn1422-0067
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.subject.ddc540eng
dc.subject.otherCartilage repaireng
dc.subject.otherChondrocyteeng
dc.subject.otherMinipigeng
dc.subject.otherMSCeng
dc.subject.otherOsteochondral defecteng
dc.subject.otherStarPEG hydrogeleng
dc.subject.otherTissue engineeringeng
dc.subject.otherZonal constructeng
dc.titleTreatment of Focal Cartilage Defects in Minipigs with Zonal Chondrocyte/Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Constructseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIPFeng
wgl.subjectBiowissensschaften/Biologieeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Treatment of focal cartilage defects in minipigs with zonal chondrocyte_mesenchymal progenitor cell constructs.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: