Low-stabilisation scenarios and technologies for carbon capture and sequestration

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage4031eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnergy Procediaeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume1eng
dc.contributor.authorBauer, N.
dc.contributor.authorEdenhofer, O.
dc.contributor.authorLeimbach, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-12T05:34:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-12T05:34:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractEndogenous technology scenarios for meeting low stabilization CO2 targets are derived in this study and assessed regarding emission reductions and mitigation costs. The aim is to indentify the most important technology options for achieving low stabilization targets. The significance of an option is indicated by its achieved emission reduction and the mitigation cost increase, if this option were not available. Quantitative results are computed using a global multi-regional hard-linked hybrid model that integrates the economy, the energy sector and the climate system. The model endogenously determines the optimal deployment of technologies subject to a constraint on climate change. The alternative options in the energy sector comprise the most important mitigation technologies: renewables, biomass, nuclear, carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), and biomass with CCS as well as energy efficiency improvements. The results indicate that the availability of CCS technologies and espec. biomass with CCS is highly desirable for achieving low stabilization goals at low costs. The option of nuclear energy is different: although it could play an important role in the primary energy mix, mitigation costs would only mildly increase, if it could not be expanded. Therefore, in order to promote prudent climate change mitigation goals, support of CCS technologies reduces the costs and-thus-is desirable from a social point of view. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/5512
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/4141
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam : Elseviereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.209
dc.relation.issn1876-6102
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.subject.otherBiomasseng
dc.subject.otherCarbon Capture and Sequestrationeng
dc.subject.otherHybrid Modelseng
dc.subject.otherLow-stabilizationeng
dc.subject.otherCarbon Capture and Sequestrationeng
dc.subject.otherCarbon capture and sequestrationseng
dc.subject.otherClimate change mitigationeng
dc.subject.otherClimate systemeng
dc.subject.otherEmission reductioneng
dc.subject.otherEnergy efficiency improvementseng
dc.subject.otherEnergy sectoreng
dc.subject.otherHybrid modeleng
dc.subject.otherHybrid Modelseng
dc.subject.otherLow costseng
dc.subject.otherLow-stabilizationeng
dc.subject.otherMitigation costseng
dc.subject.otherOptimal deploymenteng
dc.subject.otherPrimary energy mixeng
dc.subject.otherQuantitative resulteng
dc.subject.otherRenewableseng
dc.subject.otherStabilisationeng
dc.subject.otherStabilization targeteng
dc.subject.otherTechnology optionseng
dc.subject.otherTechnology scenarioseng
dc.subject.otherBiomasseng
dc.subject.otherCostseng
dc.subject.otherEmission controleng
dc.subject.otherEnergy efficiencyeng
dc.subject.otherGas emissionseng
dc.subject.otherHybrid sensorseng
dc.subject.otherPower generationeng
dc.subject.otherStabilizationeng
dc.subject.otherTechnologyeng
dc.subject.otherUltrahigh molecular weight polyethyleneseng
dc.subject.otherClimate changeeng
dc.titleLow-stabilisation scenarios and technologies for carbon capture and sequestrationeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bauer et al 2010, Low-stabilisation scenarios and technologies for carbon capture and sequestration.pdf
Size:
439.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: