Discourses of climate delay

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPagee17eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume3eng
dc.contributor.authorLamb, William F.
dc.contributor.authorMattioli, Giulio
dc.contributor.authorLevi, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, J. Timmons
dc.contributor.authorCapstick, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorCreutzig, Felix
dc.contributor.authorMinx, Jan C.
dc.contributor.authorMüller-Hansen, Finn
dc.contributor.authorCulhane, Trevor
dc.contributor.authorSteinberger, Julia K.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T10:22:10Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T10:22:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractNon-technical summary: Discourses of climate delay' pervade current debates on climate action. These discourses accept the existence of climate change, but justify inaction or inadequate efforts. In contemporary discussions on what actions should be taken, by whom and how fast, proponents of climate delay would argue for minimal action or action taken by others. They focus attention on the negative social effects of climate policies and raise doubt that mitigation is possible. Here, we outline the common features of climate delay discourses and provide a guide to identifying them. Technical summary: Through our collective observations as social scientists studying climate change, we describe 12 climate delay discourses and develop a typology based on their underlying logic. Delay discourses can be grouped into those that: (1) redirect responsibility; (2) push non-transformative solutions; (3) emphasize the downsides of climate policies; or (4) surrender to climate change. These discourses are distinct from climate denialism, climate-impact scepticism and ad hominem attacks, but are often used in combination to erode public and political support for climate policies. A deeper investigation of climate delay discourses is necessary in order to understand their prevalence and to develop inoculation strategies that protect the public from their intended effects. Our typology enables scientists, climate advocates and policymakers to recognize and counter these arguments when they are used. We urge all proponents of climate action to address these common misrepresentations of the climate crisis and to better communicate the dramatic pace of global warming, the gravity of its impacts and the possibility of effective and just mitigation policies. Social media summary: Discourses of climate delay: redirect responsibility, push non-transformative solutions, emphasize downsides, surrender. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7259
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6306
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherCambridge : Cambridge Univ. Presseng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
dc.relation.essn2059-4798
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Sustainability 3 (2020)eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectclimate delayeng
dc.subjectclimate denialeng
dc.subjectcounter-movementeng
dc.subjectdiscourseseng
dc.subject.ddc333,7eng
dc.titleDiscourses of climate delayeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleGlobal Sustainabilityeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
discourses-of-climate-delay.pdf
Size:
310.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: