The impact of atmospheric boundary layer, opening configuration and presence of animals on the ventilation of a cattle barn

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage104185eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamicseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume201eng
dc.contributor.authorNosek, Štěpán
dc.contributor.authorKluková, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorJakubcová, Michaela
dc.contributor.authorYi, Qianying
dc.contributor.authorJanke, David
dc.contributor.authorDemeyer, Peter
dc.contributor.authorJaňour, Zbyněk
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T09:37:53Z
dc.date.available2021-07-23T09:37:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractNaturally ventilated livestock buildings (NVLB) represent one of the most significant sources of ammonia emissions. However, even the dispersion of passive gas in an NVLB is still not well understood. In this paper, we present a detailed investigation of passive pollutant dispersion in a model of a cattle barn using the wind tunnel experiment method. We simulated the pollution of the barn by a ground-level planar source. We used the time-resolved particle image velocimetry (TR-PIV) and the fast flame ionisation detector (FFID) to study the flow and dispersion processes at high spatial and temporal resolution. We employed the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Oscillating Patterns Decomposition (OPD) methods to detect the coherent structures of the flow. The results show that the type of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) and sidewall opening height have a significant impact on the pollutant dispersion in the barn, while the presence of animals and doors openings are insignificant under conditions of winds perpendicular to the sidewall openings. We found that the dynamic coherent structures, developed by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, contribute to the pollutant transport in the barn. We demonstrate that in any of the studied cases the pollutant was not well mixed within the barn and that a significant underestimation (up to by a factor 3) of the barn ventilation might be obtained using, e.g. tracer gas method. © 2020 The Authorseng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6343
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/5390
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Scienceeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104185
dc.relation.essn1872-8189
dc.relation.essn1872-8197
dc.relation.issn0167-6105
dc.relation.issn0304-3908
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc690eng
dc.subject.ddc530eng
dc.subject.otherAir pollutioneng
dc.subject.otherAtmospheric boundary layereng
dc.subject.otherLivestock buildingeng
dc.subject.otherNatural ventilationeng
dc.subject.otherOPDeng
dc.subject.otherTR-PIVeng
dc.subject.otherWind tunneleng
dc.titleThe impact of atmospheric boundary layer, opening configuration and presence of animals on the ventilation of a cattle barneng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorATBeng
wgl.subjectPhysikeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167610520300957-main.pdf
Size:
5.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: