Multimodel assessment of flood characteristics in four large river basins at global warming of 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 K above the pre-industrial level

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage124005
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue12
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental Research Letterseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume13
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Shaochun
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Rohini
dc.contributor.authorRakovec, Oldrich
dc.contributor.authorAich, Valentin
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaoyan
dc.contributor.authorSamaniego, Luis
dc.contributor.authorLiersch, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorKrysanova, Valentina
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T13:46:09Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T13:46:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis study assesses the flood characteristics (timing, magnitude and frequency) in the pre-industrial and historical periods, and analyzes climate change impacts on floods at the warming levels of 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 K above the pre-industrial level in four large river basins as required by the Paris agreement. Three well-established hydrological models (HMs) were forced with bias-corrected outputs from four global climate models (GCMs) for the pre-industrial, historical and future periods until 2100. The long pre-industrial and historical periods were subdivided into multiple 31-year subperiods to investigate the natural variability. The mean flood characteristics in the pre-industrial period were derived from the large ensemble based on all GCMs, HMs and 31-year subperiods, and compared to the ensemble means in the historical and future periods. In general, the variance of simulated flood characteristics is quite large in the pre-industrial and historical periods. Mostly GCMs and HMs contribute to the variance, especially for flood timing and magnitude, while the selection of 31-year subperiods is an important source of variance for flood frequency. The comparison between the ensemble means shows that there are already some changes in flood characteristics between the pre-industrial and historical periods. There is a clear shift towards earlier flooding for the Rhine (1.5 K scenario) and Upper Mississippi (3.0 K scenario). The flood magnitudes show a substantial increase in the Rhine and Upper Yellow only under the 3.0 K scenario. The floods are projected to occur more frequently in the Rhine under the 1.5 and 2.0 K scenarios, and less frequently in the Upper Mississippi under all scenarios.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10878
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9904
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publ.
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae94b
dc.relation.essn1748-9326
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
dc.subject.ddc690
dc.subject.other100 year floodseng
dc.subject.otherclimate changeeng
dc.subject.otherCMIP5-GCMseng
dc.subject.otherflood frequencyeng
dc.subject.otherflood timingeng
dc.subject.othermulti-model ensembleeng
dc.titleMultimodel assessment of flood characteristics in four large river basins at global warming of 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 K above the pre-industrial leveleng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Huang_2018_Environ_Res_Lett_13_124005.pdf
Size:
804.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: