Introducing urine-enriched biochar-based fertilizer for vegetable production: acceptability and results from rural Bangladesh

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage12954eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue9eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironment, development and sustainability : a multidisciplinary approach to the theory and practice of sustainable developmenteng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage12975eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume23eng
dc.contributor.authorSutradhar, Ipsita
dc.contributor.authorJackson-deGraffenried, Meredith
dc.contributor.authorAkter, Sayema
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Shannon A.
dc.contributor.authorWaid, Jillian L.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Hans-Peter
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Amanda S.
dc.contributor.authorGabrysch, Sabine
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T13:56:33Z
dc.date.available2022-01-24T13:56:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractImproved agricultural practices that increase yields and preserve soils are critical to addressing food insecurity and undernutrition among smallholder farmer families. Urine-enriched biochar has been shown to be an accessible and effective fertilization option in various subtropical countries; however, it is new to Bangladesh. To better understand attitudes and experiences preparing and using urine-enriched biochar fertilizer, mixed-methods research was undertaken among smallholder farmers in northeastern Bangladesh in 2016/2017. In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 respondents who had compared the production of crops grown with biochar-based fertilizer to usual practice. In addition, in areas where trainings on biochar-based fertilization had been offered, 845 farmers were asked about their experience through a quantitative survey. Interview results indicated that cow urine-enriched biochar was favored over human urine because cow urine was perceived as clean and socially acceptable, whereas human urine was considered impure and disgusting. Respondents praised biochar-based fertilizer because it increased yields, cost little, was convenient to prepare with readily available natural materials, produced tastier crops, and allowed families to share their larger yields which in turn enhanced social and financial capital. Comparative field trials indicated a 60% yield benefit in both cabbage and kohlrabi crops. Challenges included uneven access to ingredients, with some respondents having difficulty procuring cow urine and biomass feedstock. The low social, health, and financial risk of adoption and the perceived benefits motivated farmers to produce and apply biochar-based fertilizer in their gardens, demonstrating strong potential for scale-up of this technology in Bangladesh.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7903
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6944
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisher[S.l.] : Proquesteng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01194-y
dc.relation.essn1573-2975
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc333.7eng
dc.subject.otherAdhesion promotoreng
dc.subject.otherAnchor peptide Tachystatin A2eng
dc.subject.otherCutinase Tcur1278eng
dc.subject.otherMicroplastic degradationeng
dc.subject.otherPolyester-polyurethaneeng
dc.titleIntroducing urine-enriched biochar-based fertilizer for vegetable production: acceptability and results from rural Bangladesheng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Introducing urine-enriched biochar-based fertilizer for vegetable production_acceptability and results from rural Bangladesh.pdf
Size:
1.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: