Climate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology models

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage129eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage144eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume4
dc.contributor.authorHagemann, S.
dc.contributor.authorChen, C.
dc.contributor.authorClark, D.B.
dc.contributor.authorFolwell, S.
dc.contributor.authorGosling, S.N.
dc.contributor.authorHaddeland, I.
dc.contributor.authorHanasaki, N.
dc.contributor.authorHeinke, J.
dc.contributor.authorLudwig, F.
dc.contributor.authorVoss, F.
dc.contributor.authorWiltshire, A.J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T00:07:38Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T10:35:23Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractClimate change is expected to alter the hydrological cycle resulting in large-scale impacts on water availability. However, future climate change impact assessments are highly uncertain. For the first time, multiple global climate (three) and hydrological models (eight) were used to systematically assess the hydrological response to climate change and project the future state of global water resources. This multi-model ensemble allows us to investigate how the hydrology models contribute to the uncertainty in projected hydrological changes compared to the climate models. Due to their systematic biases, GCM outputs cannot be used directly in hydrological impact studies, so a statistical bias correction has been applied. The results show a large spread in projected changes in water resources within the climate–hydrology modelling chain for some regions. They clearly demonstrate that climate models are not the only source of uncertainty for hydrological change, and that the spread resulting from the choice of the hydrology model is larger than the spread originating from the climate models over many areas. But there are also areas showing a robust change signal, such as at high latitudes and in some midlatitude regions, where the models agree on the sign of projected hydrological changes, indicative of higher confidence in this ensemble mean signal. In many catchments an increase of available water resources is expected but there are some severe decreases in Central and Southern Europe, the Middle East, the Mississippi River basin, southern Africa, southern China and south-eastern Australia.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/179
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3877
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherMünchen : European Geopyhsical Unioneng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-129-2013
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEarth System Dynamics, Volume 4, Issue 1, Page 129-144eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectClimate change impacteng
dc.subjectGlobal water resourceseng
dc.subjectHydrological changeseng
dc.subjectHydrological impactseng
dc.subjectHydrological responseeng
dc.subjectMississippi River Basineng
dc.subjectMulti-model ensembleeng
dc.subjectSouth-eastern Australiaeng
dc.subject.ddc500eng
dc.titleClimate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology modelseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEarth System Dynamicseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
esd-4-129-2013-supplement.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
esd-4-129-2013.pdf
Size:
9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: