Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies

dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume9
dc.contributor.authorHumpenöder, Florian
dc.contributor.authorPopp, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorDietrich, Jan Philip
dc.contributor.authorKlein, David
dc.contributor.authorLotze-Campen, Hermann
dc.contributor.authorBonsch, Markus
dc.contributor.authorBodirsky, Benjamin Leon
dc.contributor.authorWeindl, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorStevanovic, Miodrag
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T02:31:34Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T10:35:16Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThe land-use sector can contribute to climate change mitigation not only by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but also by increasing carbon uptake from the atmosphere and thereby creating negative CO2 emissions. In this paper, we investigate two land-based climate change mitigation strategies for carbon removal: (1) afforestation and (2) bioenergy in combination with carbon capture and storage technology (bioenergy CCS). In our approach, a global tax on GHG emissions aimed at ambitious climate change mitigation incentivizes land-based mitigation by penalizing positive and rewarding negative CO2 emissions from the land-use system. We analyze afforestation and bioenergy CCS as standalone and combined mitigation strategies. We find that afforestation is a cost-efficient strategy for carbon removal at relatively low carbon prices, while bioenergy CCS becomes competitive only at higher prices. According to our results, cumulative carbon removal due to afforestation and bioenergy CCS is similar at the end of 21st century (600–700 GtCO2), while land-demand for afforestation is much higher compared to bioenergy CCS. In the combined setting, we identify competition for land, but the impact on the mitigation potential (1000 GtCO2) is partially alleviated by productivity increases in the agricultural sector. Moreover, our results indicate that early-century afforestation presumably will not negatively impact carbon removal due to bioenergy CCS in the second half of the 21st century. A sensitivity analysis shows that land-based mitigation is very sensitive to different levels of GHG taxes. Besides that, the mitigation potential of bioenergy CCS highly depends on the development of future bioenergy yields and the availability of geological carbon storage, while for afforestation projects the length of the crediting period is crucial.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/309
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3851
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publishingeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064029
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnvironmental Research Letters, Volume 9, Issue 6eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectAfforestationeng
dc.subjectbioenergycarbon capture and storageeng
dc.subjectcarbon sequestrationeng
dc.subjectclimate change mitigationeng
dc.subjectland-based mitigationeng
dc.subjectlanduse modelingeng
dc.subject.ddc500eng
dc.titleInvestigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategieseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental Research Letterseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Humpenoeder_2014_Environ._Res._Lett._9_064029.pdf
Size:
1.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: