Soil pH mapping with an on-the-go sensor

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage573eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleSensorseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage598eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume11
dc.contributor.authorSchirrmann, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGebbers, Robin
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Eckart
dc.contributor.authorSeidel, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-01T12:24:03Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T13:38:27Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractSoil pH is a key parameter for crop productivity, therefore, its spatial variation should be adequately addressed to improve precision management decisions. Recently, the Veris pH ManagerTM, a sensor for high-resolution mapping of soil pH at the field scale, has been made commercially available in the US. While driving over the field, soil pH is measured on-the-go directly within the soil by ion selective antimony electrodes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Veris pH ManagerTM under farming conditions in Germany. Sensor readings were compared with data obtained by standard protocols of soil pH assessment. Experiments took place under different scenarios: (a) controlled tests in the lab, (b) semicontrolled test on transects in a stop-and-go mode, and (c) tests under practical conditions in the field with the sensor working in its typical on-the-go mode. Accuracy issues, problems, options, and potential benefits of the Veris pH ManagerTM were addressed. The tests demonstrated a high degree of linearity between standard laboratory values and sensor readings. Under practical conditions in the field (scenario c), the measure of fit (r2) for the regression between the on-the-go measurements and the reference data was 0.71, 0.63, and 0.84, respectively. Field-specific calibration was necessary to reduce systematic errors. Accuracy of the on-the-go maps was considerably higher compared with the pH maps obtained by following the standard protocols, and the error in calculating lime requirements was reduced by about one half. However, the system showed some weaknesses due to blockage by residual straw and weed roots. If these problems were solved, the on-the-go sensor investigated here could be an efficient alternative to standard sampling protocols as a basis for liming in Germany.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/4583
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/361
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBasel : MDPIeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s110100573
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-SA 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc630eng
dc.subject.otherPrecision agricultureeng
dc.subject.othersoil sensorseng
dc.subject.otherdigital soil mappingeng
dc.subject.othersoil samplingeng
dc.subject.otherpHeng
dc.subject.otherantimony electrodeeng
dc.subject.otherVeris pH ManagerTMeng
dc.titleSoil pH mapping with an on-the-go sensoreng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorATBeng
wgl.subjectLandwirtschafteng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sensors-11-00573.pdf
Size:
2.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: