Effectivity and Cost Efficiency of a Tax on Nitrogen Fertilizer to Reduce GHG Emissions from Agriculture
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage | 607 | eng |
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue | 6 | eng |
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitle | Atmosphere | eng |
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume | 11 | eng |
dc.contributor.author | Meyer-Aurich, Andreas | |
dc.contributor.author | Nadi Karatay, Yusuf | |
dc.contributor.author | Nausediene, Ausra | |
dc.contributor.author | Kirschke, Dieter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-09T08:28:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-09T08:28:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description.abstract | The use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer substantially contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to N2O emissions from agricultural soils and energy-intensive fertilizer manufacturing. Thus, a reduction of mineral N fertilizer use can contribute to reduced GHG emissions. Fertilizer tax is a potential instrument to provide incentives to apply less fertilizer and contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions. This study provides model results based on a production function analysis from field experiments in Brandenburg and Schleswig-Holstein, with respect to risk aversion by calculating certainty equivalents for different levels of risk aversion. The model results were used to identify effective and cost-efficient options considering farmers’ risk aversion to reduce N fertilizer, and to compare the potential and cost of GHG mitigation with different N fertilizer tax schemes. The results show that moderate N tax levels are effective in reducing N fertilizer levels, and thus, in curbing GHG emissions at costs below 100 €/t CO2eq for rye, barley and canola. However, in wheat production, N tax has limited effects on economically optimal N use due to the effects of N fertilizer on crop quality, which affect the sale prices of wheat. The findings indicate that the level of risk aversion does not have a consistent impact on the reduction of N fertilizer with a tax, even though the level of N fertilizer use is generally lower for risk-averse agents. The differences in N fertilizer response might have an impact on the relative advantage of different crops, which should be taken into account for an effective implementation of a tax on N fertilizer. | eng |
dc.description.fonds | Leibniz_Fonds | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | eng |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6233 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.34657/5280 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | Basel : MDPI AG | eng |
dc.relation.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060607 | |
dc.relation.essn | 2073-4433 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY 4.0 Unported | eng |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | eng |
dc.subject.ddc | 550 | eng |
dc.subject.other | nitrogen tax | eng |
dc.subject.other | mitigation of greenhouse gases | eng |
dc.subject.other | greenhouse gas mitigation cost | eng |
dc.title | Effectivity and Cost Efficiency of a Tax on Nitrogen Fertilizer to Reduce GHG Emissions from Agriculture | eng |
dc.type | Article | eng |
dc.type | Text | eng |
tib.accessRights | openAccess | eng |
wgl.contributor | ATB | eng |
wgl.subject | Umweltwissenschaften | eng |
wgl.type | Zeitschriftenartikel | eng |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- atmosphere-11-00607-v2.pdf
- Size:
- 1.04 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: