Effectivity and Cost Efficiency of a Tax on Nitrogen Fertilizer to Reduce GHG Emissions from Agriculture

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage607eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmosphereeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume11eng
dc.contributor.authorMeyer-Aurich, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorNadi Karatay, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorNausediene, Ausra
dc.contributor.authorKirschke, Dieter
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-09T08:28:57Z
dc.date.available2021-07-09T08:28:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer substantially contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to N2O emissions from agricultural soils and energy-intensive fertilizer manufacturing. Thus, a reduction of mineral N fertilizer use can contribute to reduced GHG emissions. Fertilizer tax is a potential instrument to provide incentives to apply less fertilizer and contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions. This study provides model results based on a production function analysis from field experiments in Brandenburg and Schleswig-Holstein, with respect to risk aversion by calculating certainty equivalents for different levels of risk aversion. The model results were used to identify effective and cost-efficient options considering farmers’ risk aversion to reduce N fertilizer, and to compare the potential and cost of GHG mitigation with different N fertilizer tax schemes. The results show that moderate N tax levels are effective in reducing N fertilizer levels, and thus, in curbing GHG emissions at costs below 100 €/t CO2eq for rye, barley and canola. However, in wheat production, N tax has limited effects on economically optimal N use due to the effects of N fertilizer on crop quality, which affect the sale prices of wheat. The findings indicate that the level of risk aversion does not have a consistent impact on the reduction of N fertilizer with a tax, even though the level of N fertilizer use is generally lower for risk-averse agents. The differences in N fertilizer response might have an impact on the relative advantage of different crops, which should be taken into account for an effective implementation of a tax on N fertilizer.eng
dc.description.fondsLeibniz_Fonds
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6233
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/5280
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBasel : MDPI AGeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060607
dc.relation.essn2073-4433
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.subject.othernitrogen taxeng
dc.subject.othermitigation of greenhouse gaseseng
dc.subject.othergreenhouse gas mitigation costeng
dc.titleEffectivity and Cost Efficiency of a Tax on Nitrogen Fertilizer to Reduce GHG Emissions from Agricultureeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorATBeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
atmosphere-11-00607-v2.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: