Assessment of Subsampling Strategies in Microspectroscopy of Environmental Microplastic Samples

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage579676eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleFrontiers in Environmental Scienceeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume8eng
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Josef
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorKanaki, Elisavet
dc.contributor.authorEnders, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorLabrenz, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Dieter
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-10T05:49:30Z
dc.date.available2022-02-10T05:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe analysis of environmental occurrence of microplastic (MP) particles has gained notable attention within the past decade. An effective risk assessment of MP litter requires elucidating sources of MP particles, their pathways of distribution and, ultimately, sinks. Therefore, sampling has to be done in high frequency, both spatially and temporally, resulting in a high number of samples to analyze. Microspectroscopy techniques, such as FTIR imaging or Raman particle measurements allow an accurate analysis of MP particles regarding their chemical classification and size. However, these methods are time-consuming, which gives motivation to establish subsampling protocols that require measuring less particles, while still obtaining reliable results. The challenge regarding the subsampling of environmental MP samples lies in the heterogeneity of MP types and the relatively low numbers of target particles. Herein, we present a comprehensive assessment of different proposed subsampling methods on a selection of real-world samples from different environmental compartments. The methods are analyzed and compared with respect to resulting MP count errors, which eventually allows giving recommendations for staying within acceptable error margins. Our results are based on measurements with Raman microspectroscopy, but are applicable to any other analysis technique. We show that the subsampling-errors are mainly due to statistical counting errors (i.e., extrapolation from low numbers) and only in edge cases additionally impacted by inhomogeneous distribution of particles on the filters. Keeping the subsampling-errors low can mainly be realized by increasing the fraction of MP particles in the samples.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7993
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7034
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherLausanne : Frontiers Mediaeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.579676
dc.relation.essn2296-665X
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc333.7eng
dc.subject.othermicroplasticseng
dc.subject.othersubsamplingeng
dc.subject.othermicrospectroscopyeng
dc.subject.otherRamaneng
dc.subject.otherFourier-Transform infraredeng
dc.titleAssessment of Subsampling Strategies in Microspectroscopy of Environmental Microplastic Sampleseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorIPFeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fenvs-08-579676.pdf
Size:
3.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: