Involvement of two uptake mechanisms of gold and iron oxide nanoparticles in a co-exposure scenario using mouse macrophages

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage2396eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleBeilstein Journal of Nanotechnologyeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage2409eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume8
dc.contributor.authorVanhecke, Dimitri
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Dagmar A.
dc.contributor.authorde Aberasturi, Dorleta Jimenez
dc.contributor.authorBalog, Sandor
dc.contributor.authorMilosevic, Ana
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorPeckys, Diana
dc.contributor.authorde Jonge, Niels
dc.contributor.authorParak, Wolfgang J.
dc.contributor.authorPetri-Fink, Alke
dc.contributor.authorRothen-Rutishauser, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-04T09:13:10Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T13:58:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractLittle is known about the simultaneous uptake of different engineered nanoparticle types, as it can be expected in our daily life. In order to test such co-exposure effects, murine macrophages (J774A.1 cell line) were incubated with gold (AuNPs) and iron oxide nanoparticles (FeOxNPs) either alone or combined. Environmental scanning electron microscopy revealed that single NPs of both types bound within minutes on the cell surface but with a distinctive difference between FeOxNPs and AuNPs. Uptake analysis studies based on laser scanning microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry revealed intracellular appearance of both NP types in all exposure scenarios and a time-dependent increase. This increase was higher for both AuNPs and FeOxNPs during co-exposure. Cells treated with endocytotic inhibitors recovered after co-exposure, which additionally hinted that two uptake mechanisms are involved. Cross-talk between uptake pathways is relevant for toxicological studies: Co-exposure acts as an uptake accelerant. If the goal is to maximize the cellular uptake, e.g., for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents, this can be beneficial. However, co-exposure should also be taken into account in the case of risk assessment of occupational settings. The demonstration of co-exposure-invoked pathway interactions reveals that synergetic nanoparticle effects, either positive or negative, must be considered for nanotechnology and nanomedicine in particular to develop to its full potential.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/457
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/4619
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherFrankfurt am Main : Beilstein-Instituteng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.8.239
dc.rights.licenseThis document may be downloaded, read, stored and printed for your own use within the limits of § 53 UrhG but it may not be distributed via the internet or passed on to external parties.eng
dc.rights.licenseDieses Dokument darf im Rahmen von § 53 UrhG zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei heruntergeladen, gelesen, gespeichert und ausgedruckt, aber nicht im Internet bereitgestellt oder an Außenstehende weitergegeben werden.ger
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.subject.otherco-exposureeng
dc.subject.otherendocytosiseng
dc.subject.otherlive cell imagingeng
dc.subject.othernanoparticleseng
dc.subject.otherquantitative microscopyeng
dc.titleInvolvement of two uptake mechanisms of gold and iron oxide nanoparticles in a co-exposure scenario using mouse macrophageseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorINMeng
wgl.subjectBiowissenschaften/Biologieeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
inm2017075.pdf
Size:
12.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: