All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisal

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage064037
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental research letters : ERLeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume16
dc.contributor.authorWarszawski, Lila
dc.contributor.authorKriegler, Elmar
dc.contributor.authorLenton, Timothy M.
dc.contributor.authorGaffney, Owen
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorKlingenfeld, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorKoide, Ryu
dc.contributor.authorMáñez Costa, María
dc.contributor.authorMessner, Dirk
dc.contributor.authorNakicenovic, Nebojsa
dc.contributor.authorSchellnhuber, Hans Joachim
dc.contributor.authorSchlosser, Peter
dc.contributor.authorTakeuchi, Kazuhiko
dc.contributor.authorVan Der Leeuw, Sander
dc.contributor.authorWhiteman, Gail
dc.contributor.authorRockström, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-02T09:19:52Z
dc.date.available2022-12-02T09:19:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-5-25
dc.description.abstractClimate science provides strong evidence of the necessity of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, in line with the Paris Climate Agreement. The IPCC 1.5 °C special report (SR1.5) presents 414 emissions scenarios modelled for the report, of which around 50 are classified as '1.5 °C scenarios', with no or low temperature overshoot. These emission scenarios differ in their reliance on individual mitigation levers, including reduction of global energy demand, decarbonisation of energy production, development of land-management systems, and the pace and scale of deploying carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. The reliance of 1.5 °C scenarios on these levers needs to be critically assessed in light of the potentials of the relevant technologies and roll-out plans. We use a set of five parameters to bundle and characterise the mitigation levers employed in the SR1.5 1.5 °C scenarios. For each of these levers, we draw on the literature to define 'medium' and 'high' upper bounds that delineate between their 'reasonable', 'challenging' and 'speculative' use by mid century. We do not find any 1.5 °C scenarios that stay within all medium upper bounds on the five mitigation levers. Scenarios most frequently 'over use' CDR with geological storage as a mitigation lever, whilst reductions of energy demand and carbon intensity of energy production are 'over used' less frequently. If we allow mitigation levers to be employed up to our high upper bounds, we are left with 22 of the SR1.5 1.5 °C scenarios with no or low overshoot. The scenarios that fulfil these criteria are characterised by greater coverage of the available mitigation levers than those scenarios that exceed at least one of the high upper bounds. When excluding the two scenarios that exceed the SR1.5 carbon budget for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, this subset of 1.5 °C scenarios shows a range of 15–22 Gt CO2 (16–22 Gt CO2 interquartile range) for emissions in 2030. For the year of reaching net zero CO2 emissions the range is 2039–2061 (2049–2057 interquartile range).eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10478
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9514
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publ.
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfeec
dc.relation.essn1748-9326
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc690
dc.subject.other1.5 ◦Ceng
dc.subject.otherClimate changeeng
dc.subject.otherEmissions scenarioseng
dc.subject.otherNegative emissionseng
dc.titleAll options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisaleng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
All_options_not_silver.pdf
Size:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: