Freshwater requirements of large-scale bioenergy plantations for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage084001eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue8eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental research letters : ERLeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume14eng
dc.contributor.authorStenzel, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorGerten, Dieter
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Constanze
dc.contributor.authorJägermeyr, Jonas
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:37:54Z
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:37:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractLimiting mean global warming to well below 2 °C will probably require substantial negative emissions (NEs) within the 21st century. To achieve these, bioenergy plantations with subsequent carbon capture and storage (BECCS) may have to be implemented at a large scale. Irrigation of these plantations might be necessary to increase the yield, which is likely to put further pressure on already stressed freshwater systems. Conversely, the potential of bioenergy plantations (BPs) dedicated to achieving NEs through CO2 assimilation may be limited in regions with low freshwater availability. This paper provides a first-order quantification of the biophysical potentials of BECCS as a negative emission technology contribution to reaching the 1.5 °C warming target, as constrained by associated water availabilities and requirements. Using a global biosphere model, we analyze the availability of freshwater for irrigation of BPs designed to meet the projected NEs to fulfill the 1.5 °C target, spatially explicitly on areas not reserved for ecosystem conservation or agriculture. We take account of the simultaneous water demands for agriculture, industries, and households and also account for environmental flow requirements (EFRs) needed to safeguard aquatic ecosystems. Furthermore, we assess to what extent different forms of improved water management on the suggested BPs and on cropland may help to reduce the freshwater abstractions. Results indicate that global water withdrawals for irrigation of BPs range between ∼400 and ∼3000 km3 yr−1, depending on the scenario and the conversion efficiency of the carbon capture and storage process. Consideration of EFRs reduces the NE potential significantly, but can partly be compensated for by improved on-field water management.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10037
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9075
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publ.eng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2b4b
dc.relation.essn1748-9326
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc690eng
dc.subject.otherBECCSeng
dc.subject.otherbioenergy plantationseng
dc.subject.otherclimate changeeng
dc.subject.otherenvironmental flow requirementseng
dc.subject.otherirrigationeng
dc.subject.othernegative emissionseng
dc.subject.otherwater demandeng
dc.titleFreshwater requirements of large-scale bioenergy plantations for limiting global warming to 1.5 °Ceng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Freshwater_requirements_of.pdf
Size:
7.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: