Revisiting the Space Weather Environment of Proxima Centauri b

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPageL8
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleThe Astrophysical Journal Letterseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume941
dc.contributor.authorGarraffo, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorAlvarado-Gómez, Julián D.
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Ofer
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Jeremy J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T08:02:53Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06T08:02:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractClose-in planets orbiting around low-mass stars are exposed to intense energetic photon and particle radiation and harsh space weather. We have modeled such conditions for Proxima Centauri b, a rocky planet orbiting in the habitable zone of our closest neighboring star, finding a stellar wind pressure 3 orders of magnitude higher than the solar wind pressure on Earth. At that time, no Zeeman-Doppler observations of the surface magnetic field distribution of Proxima Cen were available and a proxy from a star with a similar Rossby number to Proxima was used to drive the MHD model. Recently, the first Zeeman-Doppler imaging (ZDI) observation of Proxima Cen became available. We have modeled Proxima b’s space weather using this map and compared it with the results from the proxy magnetogram. We also computed models for a high-resolution synthetic magnetogram for Proxima b generated by a state-of-the-art dynamo model. The resulting space weather conditions for these three scenarios are similar with only small differences found between the models based on the ZDI observed magnetogram and the proxy. We conclude that our proxy magnetogram prescription based on the Rossby number is valid, and provides a simple way to estimate stellar magnetic flux distributions when no direct observations are available. Comparisons with models based on the synthetic magnetogram show that the exact magnetogram details are not important for predicting global space weather conditions of planets, reinforcing earlier conclusions that the large-scale (low-order) field dominates, and that the small-scale field does not have much influence on the ambient stellar wind.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11245
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10281
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLondon : Institute of Physics Publ.
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aca487
dc.relation.essn2041-8213
dc.relation.issn2041-8205
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject.ddc520
dc.subject.otherstellar rotationeng
dc.subject.othermagnetic-fieldseng
dc.subject.otherlarge-scaleeng
dc.subject.otheremissioneng
dc.subject.othermasseng
dc.subject.otherdependenceeng
dc.subject.otherevolutioneng
dc.subject.othereinsteineng
dc.subject.otherradioeng
dc.subject.otherstarseng
dc.titleRevisiting the Space Weather Environment of Proxima Centauri beng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorAIP
wgl.subjectPhysikger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Garraffo_2022_ApJL_941_L8.pdf
Size:
525.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections