German pig farmers’ perceived agency under different nitrogen policies

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage085002eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue8eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental research communications : ERCeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume3eng
dc.contributor.authorStuhr, Luisa
dc.contributor.authorBodirsky, Benjamin Leon
dc.contributor.authorJaeger-Erben, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorBeier, Felicitas
dc.contributor.authorHunecke, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorCollignon, Quitterie
dc.contributor.authorLotze-Campen, Hermann
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T07:25:48Z
dc.date.available2022-01-25T07:25:48Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAgricultural nitrogen (N) emissions represent the most substantial N source in Germany. Even though multiple policies have been introduced at the EU and German national level to reduce agriculturally sourced reactive Nitrogen (N), Germany is exceeding the target of the government's national sustainability strategy to limit N surpluses. To form a better view of the current N policy challenges, this paper seeks to identify what constrains family-managed pig farmers in Germany from adopting N-reduced farming practices. Our study applies a practice-based approach and reconstructs farmers' practice and individual perception of the possible capability to change practices (perceived agency) through problem-centred interviews. The study identifies different ideal types of farmers based on their reported farming practices and perceived agency: The first type feeling overburdened and weary of the current requirements, the second type acting based on routine and incremental improvement efforts, and the third type adapting early and inventing. However, regarding the perceived agency to adopt N-reduced farming practices our results show that all three farmer types report only low to little agency. Based on the findings, the study identifies type-specific and type-spanning constraining factors. To resolve farmers' perceived contradictions and inconsistencies which result in the unwillingness to accept further N reduction measures, we argue that policies need to address these factors. To enhance long-term paths for sustainable N-reduced farming practices, this study concludes that N policies need to shift towards outcome-oriented policies to create a collective and holistic understanding of the desired outcome while considering their embeddedness into regional and individual contexts.eng
dc.description.fondsLeibniz_Fonds
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/7907
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/6948
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publishingeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac18a6
dc.relation.issn2515-7620
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc333.7eng
dc.subject.otherAgricultural nitrogen emissionseng
dc.subject.otherAgricultureeng
dc.subject.otherAmmonia emissionseng
dc.subject.otherFarmer typologyeng
dc.subject.otherGerman Pig farmerseng
dc.subject.otherNitrogen policieseng
dc.subject.otherPerceived agencyeng
dc.titleGerman pig farmers’ perceived agency under different nitrogen policieseng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
German pig farmers' perceived agency under different nitrogen policies.pdf
Size:
2.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: