Climate change impacts on European arable crop yields: Sensitivity to assumptions about rotations and residue management

dc.bibliographicCitation.date2023
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage126670
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEuropean Journal of Agronomyeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume142
dc.contributor.authorFaye, Babacar
dc.contributor.authorWebber, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorGaiser, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yinan
dc.contributor.authorStella, Tommaso
dc.contributor.authorLatka, Catharina
dc.contributor.authorReckling, Moritz
dc.contributor.authorHeckelei, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHelming, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorEwert, Frank
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T09:38:04Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T09:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractMost large scale studies assessing climate change impacts on crops are performed with simulations of single crops and with annual re-initialization of the initial soil conditions. This is in contrast to the reality that crops are grown in rotations, often with sizable proportion of the preceding crop residue to be left in the fields and varying soil initial conditions from year to year. In this study, the sensitivity of climate change impacts on crop yield and soil organic carbon to assumptions about annual model re-initialization, specification of crop rotations and the amount of residue retained in fields was assessed for seven main crops across Europe. Simulations were conducted for a scenario period 2040–2065 relative to a baseline from 1980 to 2005 using the SIMPLACE1 framework. Results indicated across Europe positive climate change impacts on yield for C3 crops and negative impacts for maize. The consideration of simulating rotations did not have a benefit on yield variability but on relative yield change in response to climate change which slightly increased for C3 crops and decreased for C4 crops when rotation was considered. Soil organic carbon decreased under climate change in both simulations assuming a continuous monocrop and plausible rotations by between 1% and 2% depending on the residue management strategy.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11427
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10461
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126670
dc.relation.issn1161-0301
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.subject.ddc640
dc.subject.ddc333.7
dc.subject.otherClimate change impacts assessmentseng
dc.subject.otherCrop model re-initializationeng
dc.subject.otherCrop residue managementeng
dc.subject.otherCrop rotationseng
dc.subject.otherEuropeeng
dc.titleClimate change impacts on European arable crop yields: Sensitivity to assumptions about rotations and residue managementeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2-0-S1161030122002180-main.pdf
Size:
5.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: