The global economic long-term potential of modern biomass in a climate-constrained world

dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental Research Letterseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume9
dc.contributor.authorKlein, David
dc.contributor.authorHumpenöder, Florian
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Nico
dc.contributor.authorDietrich, Jan Philipp
dc.contributor.authorPopp, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorBodirsky, Benjamin Leon
dc.contributor.authorBonsch, Markus
dc.contributor.authorLotze-Campen, Hermann
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T02:31:34Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T10:35:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractLow-stabilization scenarios consistent with the 2 °C target project large-scale deployment of purpose-grown lignocellulosic biomass. In case a GHG price regime integrates emissions from energy conversion and from land-use/land-use change, the strong demand for bioenergy and the pricing of terrestrial emissions are likely to coincide. We explore the global potential of purpose-grown lignocellulosic biomass and ask the question how the supply prices of biomass depend on prices for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the land-use sector. Using the spatially explicit global land-use optimization model MAgPIE, we construct bioenergy supply curves for ten world regions and a global aggregate in two scenarios, with and without a GHG tax. We find that the implementation of GHG taxes is crucial for the slope of the supply function and the GHG emissions from the land-use sector. Global supply prices start at $5 GJ−1 and increase almost linearly, doubling at 150 EJ (in 2055 and 2095). The GHG tax increases bioenergy prices by $5 GJ−1 in 2055 and by $10 GJ−1 in 2095, since it effectively stops deforestation and thus excludes large amounts of high-productivity land. Prices additionally increase due to costs for N2O emissions from fertilizer use. The GHG tax decreases global land-use change emissions by one-third. However, the carbon emissions due to bioenergy production increase by more than 50% from conversion of land that is not under emission control. Average yields required to produce 240 EJ in 2095 are roughly 600 GJ ha−1 yr−1 with and without tax.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/385
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3855
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publishingeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074017
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc500eng
dc.subject.otherBiomasseng
dc.subject.otherbiomass supply curveeng
dc.subject.othercarbon taxeng
dc.subject.otherclimate change mitigationeng
dc.subject.otherenergyeng
dc.subject.otherland useeng
dc.subject.otherresource potentialeng
dc.titleThe global economic long-term potential of modern biomass in a climate-constrained worldeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Klein_2014_Environ._Res._Lett._9_074017.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: