Bioenergy production and sustainable development: Science base for policymaking remains limited

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage541eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleGCB Bioenergyeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage556eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume9
dc.contributor.authorRobledo‐Abad, Carmenza
dc.contributor.authorAlthaus, Hans‐Jörg
dc.contributor.authorBerndes, Göran
dc.contributor.authorBolwig, Simon
dc.contributor.authorCorbera, Esteve
dc.contributor.authorCreutzig, Felix
dc.contributor.authorGarcia‐Ulloa, John
dc.contributor.authorGeddes, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGregg, Jay S.
dc.contributor.authorHaberl, Helmut
dc.contributor.authorHanger, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Richard J.
dc.contributor.authorHunsberger, Carol
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Rasmus K.
dc.contributor.authorLauk, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLeitner, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorLilliestam, Johan
dc.contributor.authorLotze‐Campen, Hermann
dc.contributor.authorMuys, Bart
dc.contributor.authorNordborg, Maria
dc.contributor.authorÖlund, Maria
dc.contributor.authorOrlowsky, Boris
dc.contributor.authorPopp, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorPortugal‐Pereira, Joana
dc.contributor.authorReinhard, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorScheiffle, Lena
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Pete
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-22T17:16:53Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T10:34:53Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe possibility of using bioenergy as a climate change mitigation measure has sparked a discussion of whether and how bioenergy production contributes to sustainable development. We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature to illuminate this relationship and found a limited scientific basis for policymaking. Our results indicate that knowledge on the sustainable development impacts of bioenergy production is concentrated in a few well‐studied countries, focuses on environmental and economic impacts, and mostly relates to dedicated agricultural biomass plantations. The scope and methodological approaches in studies differ widely and only a small share of the studies sufficiently reports on context and/or baseline conditions, which makes it difficult to get a general understanding of the attribution of impacts. Nevertheless, we identified regional patterns of positive or negative impacts for all categories – environmental, economic, institutional, social and technological. In general, economic and technological impacts were more frequently reported as positive, while social and environmental impacts were more frequently reported as negative (with the exception of impacts on direct substitution of GHG emission from fossil fuel). More focused and transparent research is needed to validate these patterns and develop a strong science underpinning for establishing policies and governance agreements that prevent/mitigate negative and promote positive impacts from bioenergy production.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/192
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3794
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherMilton Park : Taylor & Franciseng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12338
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subject.ddc500eng
dc.subject.otherAgricultureeng
dc.subject.otherbioenergyeng
dc.subject.otherfood securityeng
dc.subject.otherforestryeng
dc.subject.othermitigationeng
dc.subject.othersustainable developmenteng
dc.titleBioenergy production and sustainable development: Science base for policymaking remains limitedeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Robledo-Abad_et_al-2017-GCB_Bioenergy.pdf
Size:
1.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: