Implications of climate mitigation for future agricultural production

dc.bibliographicCitation.issue12eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume10
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorChryssanthacopoulos, James
dc.contributor.authorDeryng, Delphine
dc.contributor.authorFolberth, Christian
dc.contributor.authorPugh, Thomas A.M.
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Erwin
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-18T02:32:25Z
dc.date.available2019-06-28T10:35:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractClimate change is projected to negatively impact biophysical agricultural productivity in much of the world. Actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate future climate changes, are thus of central importance for agricultural production. Climate impacts are, however, not unidirectional; some crops in some regions (primarily higher latitudes) are projected to benefit, particularly if increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is assumed to strongly increase crop productivity at large spatial and temporal scales. Climate mitigation measures that are implemented by reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations lead to reductions both in the strength of climate change and in the benefits of carbon dioxide fertilization. Consequently, analysis of the effects of climate mitigation on agricultural productivity must address not only regions for which mitigation is likely to reduce or even reverse climate damages. There are also regions that are likely to see increased crop yields due to climate change, which may lose these added potentials under mitigation action. Comparing data from the most comprehensive archive of crop yield projections publicly available, we find that climate mitigation leads to overall benefits from avoided damages at the global scale and especially in many regions that are already at risk of food insecurity today. Ignoring controversial carbon dioxide fertilization effects on crop productivity, we find that for the median projection aggressive mitigation could eliminate ~81% of the negative impacts of climate change on biophysical agricultural productivity globally by the end of the century. In this case, the benefits of mitigation typically extend well into temperate regions, but vary by crop and underlying climate model projections. Should large benefits to crop yields from carbon dioxide fertilization be realized, the effects of mitigation become much more mixed, though still positive globally and beneficial in many food insecure countries.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/316
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3861
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBristol : IOP Publishingeng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125004
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnvironmental Research Letters, Volume 10, Issue 12eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectAgMIPeng
dc.subjectagricultureeng
dc.subjectcarbon dioxideeng
dc.subjectclimate changeeng
dc.subjectclimate mitigationeng
dc.subjectcrop modeleng
dc.subjectISI-MIPeng
dc.subject.ddc500eng
dc.titleImplications of climate mitigation for future agricultural productioneng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleEnvironmental Research Letterseng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorPIKeng
wgl.subjectUmweltwissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
erl125004_suppdata.pdf
Size:
551.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mueller_2015_Environ._Res._Lett._10_125004.pdf
Size:
2.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: