Micro-mechanical response of ultrafine grain and nanocrystalline tantalum

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage1804eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage1815eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume12eng
dc.contributor.authorYang, Wen
dc.contributor.authorRuestes, Carlos J.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zezhou
dc.contributor.authorTorrents Abad, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorLangdon, Terence G.
dc.contributor.authorHeiland, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorArzt, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorMeyers, Marc A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T05:27:44Z
dc.date.available2021-07-06T05:27:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIn order to investigate the effect of grain boundaries on the mechanical response in the micrometer and submicrometer levels, complementary experiments and molecular dynamics simulations were conducted on a model bcc metal, tantalum. Microscale pillar experiments (diameters of 1 and 2 μm) with a grain size of ~100–200 nm revealed a mechanical response characterized by a yield stress of ~1500 MPa. The hardening of the structure is reflected in the increase in the flow stress to 1700 MPa at a strain of ~0.35. Molecular dynamics simulations were conducted for nanocrystalline tantalum with grain sizes in the range of 20–50 nm and pillar diameters in the same range. The yield stress was approximately 6000 MPa for all specimens and the maximum of the stress–strain curves occurred at a strain of 0.07. Beyond that strain, the material softened because of its inability to store dislocations. The experimental results did not show a significant size dependence of yield stress on pillar diameter (equal to 1 and 2 um), which is attributed to the high ratio between pillar diameter and grain size (~10–20). This behavior is quite different from that in monocrystalline specimens where dislocation ‘starvation’ leads to a significant size dependence of strength. The ultrafine grains exhibit clear ‘pancaking’ upon being plastically deformed, with an increase in dislocation density. The plastic deformation is much more localized for the single crystals than for the nanocrystalline specimens, an observation made in both modeling and experiments. In the molecular dynamics simulations, the ratio of pillar diameter (20–50 nm) to grain size was in the range 0.2–2, and a much greater dependence of yield stress to pillar diameter was observed. A critical result from this work is the demonstration that the important parameter in establishing the overall deformation is the ratio between the grain size and pillar diameter; it governs the deformation mode, as well as surface sources and sinks, which are only important when the grain size is of the same order as the pillar diameter.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/6216
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/5263
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherRio de Janeiro : Elseviereng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.080
dc.relation.essn2238-7854
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Materials Research and Technology 12 (2021)eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/eng
dc.subjectMicropillareng
dc.subjectNanocrystallineeng
dc.subjectTantalumeng
dc.subject.ddc670eng
dc.titleMicro-mechanical response of ultrafine grain and nanocrystalline tantalumeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleJournal of Materials Research and Technologyeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorINMeng
wgl.subjectChemieeng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2238785421003070-main.pdf
Size:
3.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections