KMHK 1762: Another star cluster in the Large Magellanic Cloud age gap

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPageL12
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAstronomy & Astrophysicseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume664
dc.contributor.authorGatto, M.
dc.contributor.authorRipepi, V.
dc.contributor.authorBellazzini, M.
dc.contributor.authorTosi, M.
dc.contributor.authorTortora, C.
dc.contributor.authorCignoni, M.
dc.contributor.authorDall’Ora, M.
dc.contributor.authorCioni, M.-R.L.
dc.contributor.authorCusano, F.
dc.contributor.authorLongo, G.
dc.contributor.authorMarconi, M.
dc.contributor.authorMusella, I.
dc.contributor.authorSchipani, P.
dc.contributor.authorSpavone, M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T08:02:53Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06T08:02:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractContext. The star cluster (SC) age distribution of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) exhibits a gap from ∼4 to 10 Gyr ago, with an almost total absence of SCs. Within this age gap, only two confirmed SCs have been identified hitherto. Nonetheless, the star field counterpart does not show the same characteristics, making the LMC a peculiar galaxy where the star formation history and cluster formation history appear to differ significantly. Aims. We re-analysed the colour-magnitude diagram (CMD) of the KMHK 1762 SC by using the deep optical photometry provided by the ‘Yes, Magellanic Clouds Again’ survey, so as to robustly assess its age. Methods. First, we partially removed foreground and/or field stars by means of parallaxes and proper motions obtained from the Gaia Early Data Release 3. Then, we applied the Automated Stellar Cluster Analysis package to the cleaned photometric catalogue to identify the isochrone that best matches the CMD of KMHK 1762. Results. The estimated age of KMHK 1762 is log(t) = 9.74 ± 0.15 dex (∼5.5 Gyr), which is more than 2 Gyr older than the previous estimation which was obtained with shallower photometry. This value makes KMHK 1762 the third confirmed age-gap SC of the LMC. Conclusions. The physical existence of a quiescent period of the LMC SC formation is questioned. We suggest it can be the result of an observational bias, originating from the combination of shallow photometry and limited investigation of the LMC periphery.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11255
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10291
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLes Ulis : EDP Sciences
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243993
dc.relation.essn1432-0746
dc.relation.issn0004-6361
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject.ddc520
dc.subject.otherdynamicseng
dc.subject.othergalaxies: star clusters: generaleng
dc.subject.othergalaxies: star clusters: individual: KMHK 1762eng
dc.subject.otherHertzsprung-Russell and C-M diagramseng
dc.subject.otherMagellanic Cloudseng
dc.subject.otherstars: kinematicseng
dc.titleKMHK 1762: Another star cluster in the Large Magellanic Cloud age gapeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorAIP
wgl.subjectPhysikger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
aa43993-22.pdf
Size:
582.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections