Impact of the springtail’s cuticle nanotopography on bioadhesion and biofilm formation in vitro and in the oral cavity

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage171742
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue7
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleRoyal Society Open Scienceeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume5
dc.contributor.authorHannig, Christian
dc.contributor.authorHelbig, Ralf
dc.contributor.authorHilsenbeck, Julia
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorHannig, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T09:27:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T09:27:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractSpringtails (Collembola) have a nanostructured cuticle. To evaluate and to understand anti-biofouling properties of springtail cuticles’ morphology under different conditions, springtails, shed cuticles and cuticle replicates were studied after incubation with protein solutions and bacterial cultures using common in vitro models. In a second step, they were exposed to human oral environment in situ in order to explore potential application in dentistry. In vitro, the cuticular structures were found to resist wetting by albumin solutions for up to 3 h and colonization by Staphylococcus epidermidis was inhibited. When exposed in the oral cavity, initial pellicle formation was of high heterogeneity: parts of the surface were coated by adsorbed proteins, others remained uncoated but exhibited locally attached, ‘bridging’, proteinaceous membranes spanning across cavities of the cuticle surface; this unique phenomenon was observed for the first time. Also the degree of bacterial colonization varied considerably. In conclusion, the springtail cuticle partially modulates bioadhesion in the oral cavity in a unique and specific manner, but it has no universal effect. Especially after longer exposure, the nanotextured surface of springtails is masked by the pellicle, resulting in subsequent bacterial colonization, and, thus, cannot effectively avoid bioadhesion in the oral cavity comprehensively. Nevertheless, the observed phenomena offer valuable information and new perspectives for the development of antifouling surfaces applicable in the oral cavity.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/11082
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/10108
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLondon : Royal Soc. Publ.
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171742
dc.relation.essn2054-5703
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc500
dc.subject.ddc600
dc.subject.otherBioadhesioneng
dc.subject.otherCollembolaneng
dc.subject.otherHexapodseng
dc.subject.otherPellicleeng
dc.subject.otherSalivaeng
dc.subject.otherSpringtaileng
dc.titleImpact of the springtail’s cuticle nanotopography on bioadhesion and biofilm formation in vitro and in the oral cavityeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorIPF
wgl.subjectBiowissenschaften/Biologieger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
rsos_171742.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: