Search Results
Role of the dew water on the ground surface in HONO distribution: A case measurement in Melpitz
2020, Ren, Yangang, Stieger, Bastian, Spindler, Gerald, Grosselin, Benoit, Mellouki, Abdelwahid, Tuch, Thomas, Wiedensohler, Alfred, Herrmann, Hartmut
To characterize the role of dew water for the ground surface HONO distribution, nitrous acid (HONO) measurements with a Monitor for AeRosols and Gases in ambient Air (MARGA) and a LOng Path Absorption Photometer (LOPAP) instrument were performed at the Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS) research site in Melpitz, Germany, from 19 to 29 April 2018. The dew water was also collected and analyzed from 8 to 14 May 2019 using a glass sampler. The high time resolution of HONO measurements showed characteristic diurnal variations that revealed that (i) vehicle emissions are a minor source of HONO at Melpitz station; (ii) the heterogeneous conversion of NO2 to HONO on the ground surface dominates HONO production at night; (iii) there is significant nighttime loss of HONO with a sink strength of 0.16±0.12ppbv h-1; and (iv) dew water with mean NO-2 of 7.91±2.14 μgm-2 could serve as a temporary HONO source in the morning when the dew droplets evaporate. The nocturnal observations of HONO and NO2 allowed the direct evaluation of the ground uptake coefficients for these species at night: γNO2→HONO = 2.4±10-7 to 3.5±10-6, γHONO;ground = 1.7×10-5 to 2.8×10-4. A chemical model demonstrated that HONO deposition to the ground surface at night was 90 %-100% of the calculated unknown HONO source in the morning. These results suggest that dew water on the ground surface was controlling the temporal HONO distribution rather than straightforward NO2-HONO conversion. This can strongly enhance the OH reactivity throughout the morning time or in other planted areas that provide a large amount of ground surface based on the OH production rate calculation. © 2020 Copernicus GmbH. All rights reserved.
Status and future of numerical atmospheric aerosol prediction with a focus on data requirements
2018, Benedetti, Angela, Reid, Jeffrey S., Knippertz, Peter, Marsham, John H., Di Giuseppe, Francesca, Rémy, Samuel, Basart, Sara, Boucher, Olivier, Brooks, Ian M., Menut, Laurent, Mona, Lucia, Laj, Paolo, Pappalardo, Gelsomina, Wiedensohler, Alfred, Baklanov, Alexander, Brooks, Malcolm, Colarco, Peter R., Cuevas, Emilio, da Silva, Arlindo, Escribano, Jeronimo, Flemming, Johannes, Huneeus, Nicolas, Jorba, Oriol, Kazadzis, Stelios, Kinne, Stefan, Popp, Thomas, Quinn, Patricia K., Sekiyama, Thomas T., Tanaka, Taichu, Terradellas, Enric
Numerical prediction of aerosol particle properties has become an important activity at many research and operational weather centers. This development is due to growing interest from a diverse set of stakeholders, such as air quality regulatory bodies, aviation and military authorities, solar energy plant managers, climate services providers, and health professionals. Owing to the complexity of atmospheric aerosol processes and their sensitivity to the underlying meteorological conditions, the prediction of aerosol particle concentrations and properties in the numerical weather prediction (NWP) framework faces a number of challenges. The modeling of numerous aerosol-related parameters increases computational expense. Errors in aerosol prediction concern all processes involved in the aerosol life cycle including (a) errors on the source terms (for both anthropogenic and natural emissions), (b) errors directly dependent on the meteorology (e.g., mixing, transport, scavenging by precipitation), and (c) errors related to aerosol chemistry (e.g., nucleation, gas-aerosol partitioning, chemical transformation and growth, hygroscopicity). Finally, there are fundamental uncertainties and significant processing overhead in the diverse observations used for verification and assimilation within these systems. Indeed, a significant component of aerosol forecast development consists in streamlining aerosol-related observations and reducing the most important errors through model development and data assimilation. Aerosol particle observations from satellite- and ground-based platforms have been crucial to guide model development of the recent years and have been made more readily available for model evaluation and assimilation. However, for the sustainability of the aerosol particle prediction activities around the globe, it is crucial that quality aerosol observations continue to be made available from different platforms (space, near surface, and aircraft) and freely shared. This paper reviews current requirements for aerosol observations in the context of the operational activities carried out at various global and regional centers. While some of the requirements are equally applicable to aerosol-climate, the focus here is on global operational prediction of aerosol properties such as mass concentrations and optical parameters. It is also recognized that the term "requirements" is loosely used here given the diversity in global aerosol observing systems and that utilized data are typically not from operational sources. Most operational models are based on bulk schemes that do not predict the size distribution of the aerosol particles. Others are based on a mix of "bin" and bulk schemes with limited capability of simulating the size information. However the next generation of aerosol operational models will output both mass and number density concentration to provide a more complete description of the aerosol population. A brief overview of the state of the art is provided with an introduction on the importance of aerosol prediction activities. The criteria on which the requirements for aerosol observations are based are also outlined. Assimilation and evaluation aspects are discussed from the perspective of the user requirements.
A European aerosol phenomenology - 6: Scattering properties of atmospheric aerosol particles from 28 ACTRIS sites
2018, Pandolfi, Marco, Alados-Arboledas, Lucas, Alastuey, Andrés, Andrade, Marcos, Angelov, Christo, Artiñano, Begoña, Backman, John, Baltensperger, Urs, Bonasoni, Paolo, Bukowiecki, Nicolas, Collaud Coen, Martine, Conil, Sébastien, Coz, Esther, Crenn, Vincent, Dudoitis, Vadimas, Ealo, Marina, Eleftheriadis, Kostas, Favez, Olivier, Fetfatzis, Prodromos, Fiebig, Markus, Flentje, Harald, Ginot, Patrick, Gysel, Martin, Henzing, Bas, Hoffer, Andras, Holubova Smejkalova, Adela, Kalapov, Ivo, Kalivitis, Nikos, Kouvarakis, Giorgos, Kristensson, Adam, Kulmala, Markku, Lihavainen, Heikki, Lunder, Chris, Luoma, Krista, Lyamani, Hassan, Marinoni, Angela, Mihalopoulos, Nikos, Moerman, Marcel, Nicolas, José, O'Dowd, Colin, Petäjä, Tuukka, Petit, Jean-Eudes, Pichon, Jean Marc, Prokopciuk, Nina, Putaud, Jean-Philippe, Rodríguez, Sergio, Sciare, Jean, Sellegri, Karine, Swietlicki, Erik, Titos, Gloria, Tuch, Thomas, Tunved, Peter, Ulevicius, Vidmantas, Vaishya, Aditya, Vana, Milan, Virkkula, Aki, Vratolis, Stergios, Weingartner, Ernest, Wiedensohler, Alfred, Laj, Paolo
This paper presents the light-scattering properties of atmospheric aerosol particles measured over the past decade at 28 ACTRIS observatories, which are located mainly in Europe. The data include particle light scattering (σsp) and hemispheric backscattering (σbsp) coefficients, scattering Ångström exponent (SAE), backscatter fraction (BF) and asymmetry parameter (g). An increasing gradient of σsp is observed when moving from remote environments (arctic/mountain) to regional and to urban environments. At a regional level in Europe, σsp also increases when moving from Nordic and Baltic countries and from western Europe to central/eastern Europe, whereas no clear spatial gradient is observed for other station environments. The SAE does not show a clear gradient as a function of the placement of the station. However, a west-to-east-increasing gradient is observed for both regional and mountain placements, suggesting a lower fraction of fine-mode particle in western/south-western Europe compared to central and eastern Europe, where the fine-mode particles dominate the scattering. The g does not show any clear gradient by station placement or geographical location reflecting the complex relationship of this parameter with the physical properties of the aerosol particles. Both the station placement and the geographical location are important factors affecting the intraannual variability. At mountain sites, higher σsp and SAE values are measured in the summer due to the enhanced boundary layer influence and/or new particle-formation episodes. Conversely, the lower horizontal and vertical dispersion during winter leads to higher σsp values at all low-altitude sites in central and eastern Europe compared to summer. These sites also show SAE maxima in the summer (with corresponding g minima). At all sites, both SAE and g show a strong variation with aerosol particle loading. The lowest values of g are always observed together with low σsp values, indicating a larger contribution from particles in the smaller accumulation mode. During periods of high σsp values, the variation of g is less pronounced, whereas the SAE increases or decreases, suggesting changes mostly in the coarse aerosol particle mode rather than in the fine mode. Statistically significant decreasing trends of σsp are observed at 5 out of the 13 stations included in the trend analyses. The total reductions of σsp are consistent with those reported for PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentrations over similar periods across Europe.