Search Results
SemSur: A Core Ontology for the Semantic Representation of Research Findings
The way how research is communicated using text publications has not changed much over the past decades. We have the vision that ultimately researchers will work on a common structured knowledge base comprising comprehensive semantic and machine-comprehensible descriptions of their research, thus making research contributions more transparent and comparable. We present the SemSur ontology for semantically capturing the information commonly found in survey and review articles. SemSur is able to represent scientific results and to publish them in a comprehensive knowledge graph, which provides an efficient overview of a research field, and to compare research findings with related works in a structured way, thus saving researchers a significant amount of time and effort. The new release of SemSur covers more domains, defines better alignment with external ontologies and rules for eliciting implicit knowledge. We discuss possible applications and present an evaluation of our approach with the retrospective, exemplary semantification of a survey. We demonstrate the utility of the SemSur ontology to answer queries about the different research contributions covered by the survey. SemSur is currently used and maintained at OpenResearch.org.
Ontology-Based Representation for Accessible OpenCourseWare Systems
OpenCourseWare (OCW) systems have been established to provide open educational resources that are accessible by anyone, including learners with special accessibility needs and preferences. We need to find a formal and interoperable way to describe these preferences in order to use them in OCW systems and retrieve relevant educational resources. This formal representation should use standard accessibility definitions of OCW that can be reused by other OCW systems to represent accessibility concepts. In this article, we present an ontology to represent the accessibility needs of learners with respect to the IMS AfA specifications. The ontology definitions together with rule-based queries are used to retrieve relevant educational resources. Related to this, we developed a user interface component that enables users to create accessibility profiles representing their individual needs and preferences based on our ontology. We evaluated the approach with five examples profiles.
Why reinvent the wheel: Let's build question answering systems together
Modern question answering (QA) systems need to flexibly integrate a number of components specialised to fulfil specific tasks in a QA pipeline. Key QA tasks include Named Entity Recognition and Disambiguation, Relation Extraction, and Query Building. Since a number of different software components exist that implement different strategies for each of these tasks, it is a major challenge to select and combine the most suitable components into a QA system, given the characteristics of a question. We study this optimisation problem and train classifiers, which take features of a question as input and have the goal of optimising the selection of QA components based on those features. We then devise a greedy algorithm to identify the pipelines that include the suitable components and can effectively answer the given question. We implement this model within Frankenstein, a QA framework able to select QA components and compose QA pipelines. We evaluate the effectiveness of the pipelines generated by Frankenstein using the QALD and LC-QuAD benchmarks. These results not only suggest that Frankenstein precisely solves the QA optimisation problem but also enables the automatic composition of optimised QA pipelines, which outperform the static Baseline QA pipeline. Thanks to this flexible and fully automated pipeline generation process, new QA components can be easily included in Frankenstein, thus improving the performance of the generated pipelines.
Efficient retrieval of 3D building models using embeddings of attributed subgraphs
We present a novel method for retrieval and classification of 3D building models that is tailored to the specific requirements of architects. In contrast to common approaches our algorithm relies on the interior spatial arrangement of rooms instead of exterior geometric shape. We first represent the internal topological building structure by a Room Connectivity Graph (RCG). Each room is characterized by a node. Connections between rooms like e.g. doors are represented by edges. Nodes and edges are additionally assigned attributes reflecting room and edge properties like e.g area or window size. To enable fast and efficient retrieval and classification with RCGs, we transform the structured graph representation into a vector-based one. We first decompose the RCG into a set of subgraphs. For each subgraph, we compute the similarity to a set of codebook graphs. Aggregating all similarity values finally provides us with a single vector for each RCG which enables fast retrieval and classification. For evaluation, we introduce a classification scheme that was carefully developed following common guidelines in architecture.We finally provide comprehensive experiments showing that the introduced subgraph embeddings yield superior performance compared to state-of-the-art graph retrieval approaches.
RADAR-Team stellt Testsystem auf zweitem Projekt-Workshop in Frankfurt vor
Im Rahmen des Projekts "Research Data Repository" (RADAR) wurde am 23. Juni 2015 auf dem zweiten Projekt-Workshop der aktuelle Stand des Testsystems, das zur Archivierung und Publikation von Forschungsdaten genutzt werden kann, vorgestellt. Außerdem wurden weitere Anforderungen an das System und allgemeine Fragen des Forschungsdatenmanagements mit den Workshop-Teilnehmern diskutiert.
The quest for research information
Research information, i.e., data about research projects, organisations, researchers or research outputs such as publications or patents, is spread across the web, usually residing in institutional and personal web pages or in semi-open databases and information systems. While there exists a wealth of unstructured information, structured data is limited and often exposed following proprietary or less-established schemas and interfaces. Therefore, a holistic and consistent view on research information across organisational and national boundaries is not feasible. On the other hand, web crawling and information extraction techniques have matured throughout the last decade, allowing for automated approaches of harvesting, extracting and consolidating research information into a more coherent knowledge graph. In this work, we give an overview of the current state of the art in research information sharing on the web and present initial ideas towards a more holistic approach for boot-strapping research information from available web sources.
Digital Humanities Handbuch
Um das Handbuch möglichst praxisnah zu gestalten, haben wir uns entschieden, zuerst einzelne DH-Projekte vorzustellen, um die Möglichkeiten der DH den Lebringen und ihnen zu zeigen, was in der Praxis in dem Bereich derzeit schon umgesetzt wurde. So zeigen wir in Kapitel 2, wie mit TextGrid Texte editiert und meCodicology Handschriften analysiert werden. Die folgenden drei Kapitel beschäftigen sich mit den drei Säulen, die jedes Projekt in den Digital Humanities trag Methoden und Werkzeuge, und Infrastruktur. Die Kapitel bieten erste Einführungen in die jeweilige Thematik und vermitteln den Lesern an die Praxis angelehntsie in eigenen DH-Projekten anwenden können. Die Kapitel Daten und Alles was Recht ist - Urheberrecht und Lizenzierung von Forschungsdaten weisen in die Grundlage wissenschaftlichen Forschens ein und bieten Hilfestellungen im Umgang mit Lizenzen und Dateiformaten. Das Kapitel Methoden und Werkzeuge ze Digital Humanities auf und verweist beispielhaft auf digitale Werkzeuge, die für die Beantwortung geisteswissenschaftlicher Forschungsfragen herangezogen weKapitel Infrastruktur werden Digitale Infrastrukturen, deren Komponenten und Zielstellungen näher beschrieben. Sie sind unerlässlich, um die digitale Forschunund nachhaltig zu gestalten.