Filters

20192

More filters

20212
Reset filters

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.access: openAccess × End date: 2019 × Start date: 2019 × DDC: 550 × Type: Text × Version: publishedVersion × Subject: Air quality × WGL Institute: TROPOS ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Aerosol Particle and Black Carbon Emission Factors of Vehicular Fleet in Manila, Philippines
    (Basel, Switzerland : MDPI AG, 2019) Madueño, Leizel; Kecorius, Simonas; Birmili, Wolfram; Müller, Thomas; Simpas, James; Vallar, Edgar; Galvez, Maria Cecilia; Cayetano, Mylene; Wiedensohler, Alfred
    Poor air quality has been identified as one of the main risks to human health, especially in developing regions, where the information on physical chemical properties of air pollutants is lacking. To bridge this gap, we conducted an intensive measurement campaign in Manila, Philippines to determine the emission factors (EFs) of particle number (PN) and equivalent black carbon (BC). The focus was on public utility jeepneys (PUJ), equipped with old technology diesel engines, widely used for public transportation. The EFs were determined by aerosol physical measurements, fleet information, and modeled dilution using the Operational Street Pollution Model (OSPM). The results show that average vehicle EFs of PN and BC in Manila is up to two orders of magnitude higher than European emission standards. Furthermore, a PUJ emits up to seven times more than a light-duty vehicles (LDVs) and contribute to more than 60% of BC emission in Manila. Unfortunately, traffic restrictions for heavy-duty vehicles do not apply to PUJs. The results presented in this work provide a framework to help support targeted traffic interventions to improve urban air quality not only in Manila, but also in other countries with a similar fleet composed of old-technology vehicles. © 2019 by the authors.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EURODELTA III exercise: An evaluation of air quality models’ capacity to reproduce the carbonaceous aerosol
    (Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2019) Mircea, Mihaela; Bessagnet, Bertrand; D'Isidoro, Massimo; Pirovano, Guido; Aksoyoglu, Sebnem; Ciarelli, Giancarlo; Tsyro, Svetlana; Manders, Astrid; Bieser, Johannes; Stern, Rainer; Vivanco, Marta García; Cuvelier, Cornelius; Aas, Wenche; Prévôt, André S.H.; Aulinger, Armin; Briganti, Gino; Calori, Giuseppe; Cappelletti, Andrea; Colette, Augustin; Couvidat, Florian; Fagerli, Hilde; Finardi, Sandro; Kranenburg, Richard; Rouïl, Laurence; Silibello, Camillo; Spindler, Gerald; Poulain, Laurent; Herrmann, Hartmut; Jimenez, Jose L.; Day, Douglas A.; Tiitta, Petri; Carbone, Samara
    The carbonaceous aerosol accounts for an important part of total aerosol mass, affects human health and climate through its effects on physical and chemical properties of the aerosol, yet the understanding of its atmospheric sources and sinks is still incomplete. This study shows the state-of-the-art in modelling carbonaceous aerosol over Europe by comparing simulations performed with seven chemical transport models (CTMs) currently in air quality assessments in Europe: CAMx, CHIMERE, CMAQ, EMEP/MSC-W, LOTOS-EUROS, MINNI and RCGC. The simulations were carried out in the framework of the EURODELTA III modelling exercise and were evaluated against field measurements from intensive campaigns of European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and the European Integrated Project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality Interactions (EUCAARI). Model simulations were performed over the same domain, using as much as possible the same input data and covering four seasons: summer (1–30 June 2006), winter (8 January – 4 February 2007), autumn (17 September- 15 October 2008) and spring (25 February - 26 March 2009). The analyses of models’ performances in prediction of elemental carbon (EC) for the four seasons and organic aerosol components (OA) for the last two seasons show that all models generally underestimate the measured concentrations. The maximum underestimation of EC is about 60% and up to about 80% for total organic matter (TOM). The underestimation of TOM outside of highly polluted area is a consequence of an underestimation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), in particular of its main contributor: biogenic secondary aerosol (BSOA). This result is independent on the SOA modelling approach used and season. The concentrations and daily cycles of total primary organic matter (TPOM) are generally better reproduced by the models since they used the same anthropogenic emissions. However, the combination of emissions and model formulation leads to overestimate TPOM concentrations in 2009 for most of the models. All models capture relatively well the SOA daily cycles at rural stations mainly due to the spatial resolution used in the simulations. For the investigated carbonaceous aerosol compounds, the differences between the concentrations simulated by different models are lower than the differences between the concentrations simulated with a model for different seasons. © 2019 The Authors