Filters

2018 - 20192

More filters

2022 - 20232
Reset filters

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.access: openAccess × End date: 2019 × DDC: 910 × Has files: Yes × Type: Text × Version: publishedVersion × Publisher: Katlenburg-Lindau : Copernicus × Subject: sea-level rise ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Grounding-line flux formula applied as a flux condition in numerical simulations fails for buttressed Antarctic ice streams
    (Katlenburg-Lindau : Copernicus, 2018) Reese, Ronja; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Gudmundsson, G. Hilmar
    Currently, several large-scale ice-flow models impose a condition on ice flux across grounding lines using an analytically motivated parameterisation of grounding-line flux. It has been suggested that employing this analytical expression alleviates the need for highly resolved computational domains around grounding lines of marine ice sheets. While the analytical flux formula is expected to be accurate in an unbuttressed flow-line setting, its validity has hitherto not been assessed for complex and realistic geometries such as those of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Here the accuracy of this analytical flux formula is tested against an optimised ice flow model that uses a highly resolved computational mesh around the Antarctic grounding lines. We find that when applied to the Antarctic Ice Sheet the analytical expression provides inaccurate estimates of ice fluxes for almost all grounding lines. Furthermore, in many instances direct application of the analytical formula gives rise to unphysical complex-valued ice fluxes. We conclude that grounding lines of the Antarctic Ice Sheet are, in general, too highly buttressed for the analytical parameterisation to be of practical value for the calculation of grounding-line fluxes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    initMIP-Antarctica: an ice sheet model initialization experiment of ISMIP6
    (Katlenburg-Lindau : Copernicus, 2019) Seroussi, Hélène; Nowicki, Sophie; Simon, Erika; Abe-Ouchi, Ayako; Albrecht, Torsten; Brondex, Julien; Cornford, Stephen; Dumas, Christophe; Gillet-Chaulet, Fabien; Goelzer, Heiko; Golledge, Nicholas R.; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Greve, Ralf; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Humbert, Angelika; Huybrechts, Philippe; Kleiner, Thomas; Larour, Eric; Leguy, Gunter; Lipscomb, William H.; Lowry, Daniel; Mengel, Matthias; Morlighem, Mathieu; Pattyn, Frank; Payne, Anthony J.; Pollard, David; Price, Stephen F.; Quiquet, Aurélien; Reerink, Thomas J.; Reese, Ronja; Rodehacke, Christian B.; Schlegel, Nicole-Jeanne; Shepherd, Andrew; Sun, Sainan; Sutter, Johannes; Van Breedam, Jonas; van de Wal, Roderik S. W.; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Zhang, Tong
    Ice sheet numerical modeling is an important tool to estimate the dynamic contribution of the Antarctic ice sheet to sea level rise over the coming centuries. The influence of initial conditions on ice sheet model simulations, however, is still unclear. To better understand this influence, an initial state intercomparison exercise (initMIP) has been developed to compare, evaluate, and improve initialization procedures and estimate their impact on century-scale simulations. initMIP is the first set of experiments of the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6), which is the primary Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) activity focusing on the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Following initMIP-Greenland, initMIP-Antarctica has been designed to explore uncertainties associated with model initialization and spin-up and to evaluate the impact of changes in external forcings. Starting from the state of the Antarctic ice sheet at the end of the initialization procedure, three forward experiments are each run for 100 years: a control run, a run with a surface mass balance anomaly, and a run with a basal melting anomaly beneath floating ice. This study presents the results of initMIP-Antarctica from 25 simulations performed by 16 international modeling groups. The submitted results use different initial conditions and initialization methods, as well as ice flow model parameters and reference external forcings. We find a good agreement among model responses to the surface mass balance anomaly but large variations in responses to the basal melting anomaly. These variations can be attributed to differences in the extent of ice shelves and their upstream tributaries, the numerical treatment of grounding line, and the initial ocean conditions applied, suggesting that ongoing efforts to better represent ice shelves in continental-scale models should continue.