Search Results
Devitalization of Glioblastoma Cancer Cells by Non-invasive Physical Plasma: Modulation of Proliferative Signalling Cascades
2022, Lehmann, Sebastian, Bien-Möller, Sandra, Marx, Sascha, Bekeschus, Sander, Schroeder, Henry W.S., Mustea, Alexander, Stope, Matthias B.
Background/Aim: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and most lethal type of cancer of the central nervous system in adults. Despite aggressive treatment, which is based on surgical resection, if possible, followed by radiation and chemotherapy, a high recurrence rate and therapy resistance is observed. Thus, additional innovative therapies are urgently needed to improve the poor median survival of only 15 months. Treatment of solid tumours with non-invasive physical plasma (NIPP) represents such a novel and innovative anticancer procedure. Materials and Methods: In this study, we investigated the effect of NIPP, an ionized argon gas, on the in vitro growth of human GBM cell lines, LN-18 and U-87 MG. Proliferation was measured by live cell count. Subsequently, proliferative factors were analysed at the level of nucleic acids (polymerase chain reaction) and proteins (western blotting). Results: For both GBM lines, a treatment time-dependent decrease in growth was observed compared to controls. Additionally, NIPP treatment resulted in reduced rates of AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT1) and extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2 ERK1/2 expression, whereas expression of p21, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and heat-shock proteins 90α and 90β was not affected. In both cell lines, a strong increase in expression of tumour-suppressive microRNA-1 (miR-1) was detected after exposure to NIPP. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that NIPP is able to efficiently attenuate growth of GBM cells and suggest AKT1, ERK1/2 and miR-1 to be pivotal factors of NIPP-modulated cellular signalling. Translated into the clinical setting, NIPP may represent a promising option for the treatment of GBM.
Immunophenotyping of Circulating and Intratumoral Myeloid and T Cells in Glioblastoma Patients
2022, Marx, Sascha, Wilken, Fabian, Miebach, Lea, Ispirjan, Mikael, Kinnen, Frederik, Paul, Sebastian, Bien-Möller, Sandra, Freund, Eric, Baldauf, Jörg, Fleck, Steffen, Siebert, Nikolai, Lode, Holger, Stahl, Andreas, Rauch, Bernhard H., Singer, Stephan, Ritter, Christoph, Schroeder, Henry W. S., Bekeschus, Sander
Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal primary brain malignancy that almost inevitably recurs as therapy-refractory cancer. While the success of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) revealed the immense potential of immune-targeted therapies in several types of cancers outside the central nervous system, it failed to show objective responses in glioblastoma patients as of now. The ability of glioblastoma cells to drive multiple modes of T cell dysfunction while exhibiting low-quality neoepitopes, low-mutational load, and poor antigen priming limits anti-tumor immunity and efficacy of antigen-unspecific immunotherapies such as ICB. An in-depth understanding of the GBM immune landscape is essential to delineate and reprogram such immunosuppressive circuits during disease progression. In this view, the present study aimed to characterize the peripheral and intratumoral immune compartments of 35 glioblastoma patients compared to age- and sex-matched healthy control probands, particularly focusing on exhaustion signatures on myeloid and T cell subsets. Compared to healthy control participants, different immune signatures were already found in the peripheral circulation, partially related to the steroid medication the patients received. Intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ TEM cells (CD62Llow/CD45ROhigh) revealed a high expression of PD1, which was also increased on intratumoral, pro-tumorigenic macrophages/microglia. Histopathological analysis further identified high PSGL-1 expression levels of the latter, which has recently been linked to increased metastasis in melanoma and colon cancer via P-selectin-mediated platelet activation. Overall, the present study comprises immunophenotyping of a patient cohort to give implications for eligible immunotherapeutic targets in neurooncology in the future.