2022, Leinonen, Ville, Kokkola, Harri, Yli-Juuti, Taina, Mielonen, Tero, Kühn, Thomas, Nieminen, Tuomo, Heikkinen, Simo, Miinalainen, Tuuli, Bergman, Tommi, Carslaw, Ken, Decesari, Stefano, Fiebig, Markus, Hussein, Tareq, Kivekäs, Niku, Krejci, Radovan, Kulmala, Markku, Leskinen, Ari, Massling, Andreas, Mihalopoulos, Nikos, Mulcahy, Jane P., Noe, Steffen M., van Noije, Twan, O'Connor, Fiona M., O'Dowd, Colin, Olivie, Dirk, Pernov, Jakob B., Petäjä, Tuukka, Seland, Øyvind, Schulz, Michael, Scott, Catherine E., Skov, Henrik, Swietlicki, Erik, Tuch, Thomas, Wiedensohler, Alfred, Virtanen, Annele, Mikkonen, Santtu

Despite a large number of studies, out of all drivers of radiative forcing, the effect of aerosols has the largest uncertainty in global climate model radiative forcing estimates. There have been studies of aerosol optical properties in climate models, but the effects of particle number size distribution need a more thorough inspection. We investigated the trends and seasonality of particle number concentrations in nucleation, Aitken, and accumulation modes at 21 measurement sites in Europe and the Arctic. For 13 of those sites, with longer measurement time series, we compared the field observations with the results from five climate models, namely EC-Earth3, ECHAM-M7, ECHAM-SALSA, NorESM1.2, and UKESM1. This is the first extensive comparison of detailed aerosol size distribution trends between in situ observations from Europe and five earth system models (ESMs). We found that the trends of particle number concentrations were mostly consistent and decreasing in both measurements and models. However, for many sites, climate models showed weaker decreasing trends than the measurements. Seasonal variability in measured number concentrations, quantified by the ratio between maximum and minimum monthly number concentration, was typically stronger at northern measurement sites compared to other locations. Models had large differences in their seasonal representation, and they can be roughly divided into two categories: for EC-Earth and NorESM, the seasonal cycle was relatively similar for all sites, and for other models the pattern of seasonality varied between northern and southern sites. In addition, the variability in concentrations across sites varied between models, some having relatively similar concentrations for all sites, whereas others showed clear differences in concentrations between remote and urban sites. To conclude, although all of the model simulations had identical input data to describe anthropogenic mass emissions, trends in differently sized particles vary among the models due to assumptions in emission sizes and differences in how models treat size-dependent aerosol processes. The inter-model variability was largest in the accumulation mode, i.e. sizes which have implications for aerosol-cloud interactions. Our analysis also indicates that between models there is a large variation in efficiency of long-range transportation of aerosols to remote locations. The differences in model results are most likely due to the more complex effect of different processes instead of one specific feature (e.g. the representation of aerosol or emission size distributions). Hence, a more detailed characterization of microphysical processes and deposition processes affecting the long-range transport is needed to understand the model variability.

2016, Kürten, Andreas, Bianchi, Federico, Almeida, Joao, Kupiainen-Määttä, Oona, Dunne, Eimear M., Duplissy, Jonathan, Williamson, Christina, Barmet, Peter, Breitenlechner, Martin, Dommen, Josef, Donahue, Neil M., Flagan, Richard C., Franchin, Alessandro, Gordon, Hamish, Hakala, Jani, Hansel, Armin, Heinritzi, Martin, Ickes, Luisa, Jokinen, Tuija, Kangasluoma, Juha, Kim, Jaeseok, Kirkby, Jasper, Kupc, Agnieszka, Lehtipalo, Katrianne, Leiminger, Markus, Makhmutov, Vladimir, Onnela, Antti, Ortega, Ismael K., Petäjä, Tuukka, Praplan, Arnaud P., Riccobono, Francesco, Rissanen, Matti P., Rondo, Linda, Schnitzhofer, Ralf, Schobesberger, Siegfried, Smith, James N., Steiner, Gerhard, Stozhkov, Yuri, Tomé, António, Tröstl, Jasmin, Tsagkogeorgas, Georgios, Wagner, Paul E., Wimmer, Daniela, Ye, Penglin, Baltensperger, Urs, Carslaw, Ken, Kulmala, Markku, Curtius, Joachim

Binary nucleation of sulfuric acid and water as well as ternary nucleation involving ammonia are thought to be the dominant processes responsible for new particle formation (NPF) in the cold temperatures of the middle and upper troposphere. Ions are also thought to be important for particle nucleation in these regions. However, global models presently lack experimentally measured NPF rates under controlled laboratory conditions and so at present must rely on theoretical or empirical parameterizations. Here with data obtained in the European Organization for Nuclear Research CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets) chamber, we present the first experimental survey of NPF rates spanning free tropospheric conditions. The conditions during nucleation cover a temperature range from 208 to 298 K, sulfuric acid concentrations between 5 × 105 and 1 × 109 cm−3, and ammonia mixing ratios from zero added ammonia, i.e., nominally pure binary, to a maximum of ~1400 parts per trillion by volume (pptv). We performed nucleation studies under pure neutral conditions with zero ions being present in the chamber and at ionization rates of up to 75 ion pairs cm−3 s−1 to study neutral and ion-induced nucleation. We found that the contribution from ion-induced nucleation is small at temperatures between 208 and 248 K when ammonia is present at several pptv or higher. However, the presence of charges significantly enhances the nucleation rates, especially at 248 K with zero added ammonia, and for higher temperatures independent of NH3 levels. We compare these experimental data with calculated cluster formation rates from the Atmospheric Cluster Dynamics Code with cluster evaporation rates obtained from quantum chemistry.

2017, Schmale, Julia, Henning, Silvia, Henzing, Bas, Keskinen, Helmi, Sellegri, Karine, Ovadnevaite, Jurgita, Bougiatioti, Aikaterini, Kalivitis, Nikos, Stavroulas, Iasonas, Jefferson, Anne, Park, Minsu, Schlag, Patrick, Kristensson, Adam, Iwamoto, Yoko, Pringle, Kirsty, Reddington, Carly, Aalto, Pasi, Äijälä, Mikko, Baltensperger, Urs, Bialek, Jakub, Birmili, Wolfram, Bukowiecki, Nicolas, Ehn, Mikael, Fjæraa, Ann Mari, Fiebig, Markus, Frank, Göran, Fröhlich, Roman, Frumau, Arnoud, Furuya, Masaki, Hammer, Emanuel, Heikkinen, Liine, Herrmann, Erik, Holzinger, Rupert, Hyono, Hiroyuki, Kanakidou, Maria, Kiendler-Scharr, Astrid, Kinouchi, Kento, Kos, Gerard, Kulmala, Markku, Mihalopoulos, Nikolaos, Motos, Ghislain, Nenes, Athanasios, O’Dowd, Colin, Paramonov, Mikhail, Petäjä, Tuukka, Picard, David, Poulain, Laurent, Prévôt, André Stephan Henry, Slowik, Jay, Sonntag, Andre, Swietlicki, Erik, Svenningsson, Birgitta, Tsurumaru, Hiroshi, Wiedensohler, Alfred, Wittbom, Cerina, Ogren, John A., Matsuki, Atsushi, Yum, Seong Soo, Myhre, Cathrine Lund, Carslaw, Ken, Stratmann, Frank, Gysel, Martin

Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) number concentrations alongside with submicrometer particle number size distributions and particle chemical composition have been measured at atmospheric observatories of the Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure (ACTRIS) as well as other international sites over multiple years. Here, harmonized data records from 11 observatories are summarized, spanning 98,677 instrument hours for CCN data, 157,880 for particle number size distributions, and 70,817 for chemical composition data. The observatories represent nine different environments, e.g., Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Mediterranean maritime, boreal forest, or high alpine atmospheric conditions. This is a unique collection of aerosol particle properties most relevant for studying aerosol-cloud interactions which constitute the largest uncertainty in anthropogenic radiative forcing of the climate. The dataset is appropriate for comprehensive aerosol characterization (e.g., closure studies of CCN), model-measurement intercomparison and satellite retrieval method evaluation, among others. Data have been acquired and processed following international recommendations for quality assurance and have undergone multiple stages of quality assessment.