Search Results
Determination of fluoride component in the multifunctional refining flux used for recycling aluminum scrap
2020, Wan, Bingbing, Li, Wenfang, Liu, Fangfang, Lu, Tiwen, Jin, Shuoxun, Wang, Kang, Yi, Aihua, Tian, Jun, Chen, Weiping
In this paper, the optimum fluoride component in the multifunctional refining flux used for recycling aluminum scrap was determined. Theoretical analysis of solid fluxing shows that strong stripping ability of oxide layer on aluminum surface for the flux and appropriate interfacial tensions between Al melt / inclusion (σM-I), flux / inclusion (σF-I), and flux / Al melt (σF-M) are indispensable for making the flux achieve the properties of covering, drossing, and cleaning simultaneously. In term of four preliminarily selected fluoride salts, i.e., KF, AlF3, K3AlF6 and KAlF4, the results of interfacial tension measurements indicates that, combined addition of A-type fluoride (KF) and B-type fluoride (AlF3, K3AlF6 and KAlF4) to equimolar NaCl-KCl can just offset the shortage of single addition of KF which means worsening the separating effect of flux from melt surface and weakening the wettability of flux on the inclusions due to the lower σF-M and the higher σF-I respectively. Additionally, coalescence behaviors of aluminum droplets in molten fluxes reveals that, KF, K3AlF6 or KAlF4 possesses stronger stripping ability of oxide layer, while the stripping ability of oxide layer for AlF3 is weaker. Ultimately, the combination of KF with K3AlF6 or/and KAlF4 is ascertained to be an optimum selection for fluoride component in the multifunctional refining flux.
Microstructure, mechanical properties and machinability of particulate reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study between SiC particles and high-entropy alloy particles
2020, Lu, Tiwen, He, Tianbing, Li, Zixuan, Chen, Hongyu, Han, Xiaoliang, Fu, Zhiqiang, Chen, Weiping
In this study, 2024Al matrix composites reinforced by SiC particles (SiC-2024Al) and nanocrystalline high-entropy alloy particles (HEA-2024Al) fabricated by powder metallurgy were systematically compared for the first time. There is a significant difference in microstructure and mechanical properties as well as machinability between two kinds of composites. In term of microstructure, when the volume fraction of reinforcements was 10%, both SiC-2024Al and HEA-2024Al composites showed a homogeneous particle distribution in the matrix. With the increase of reinforcement content, HEA-2024Al composites presented denser microstructure than that of SiC-2024Al composites. The composites with 10, 20 and 30 vol.% HEA reinforcements all showed better plasticity than that of the SiC-2024Al composites with same volume fraction of reinforcements, which was related with better particle distribution and interface bonding. However, the strength showed the opposite tendency in the two kinds of composites. Selecting 10SiC-2024Al and 10HEA-2024Al composites as examples to explore the difference in the yield strength of two kinds of composites, it is ascribed to the dislocation punched zones around interface between the Al matrix and reinforcements, which was analyzed in detail by a combination of calculation, nanoindentation tests and finite element analysis. Additionally, HEA-2024Al composites showed better machinability than those of SiC-2024Al composites. This work provides insight into the application of particulate reinforced Al matrix composites.