Search Results
ORCID DE 2 – Konsolidierung der ORCID-Informationsinfrastruktur in Deutschland
2019, Bertelmann, Roland, Cruse, Patricia, Niggemann, Elisabeth, Pieper, Dirk, Sens, Irina, Burger, Marleen, Dasler, Robin, Dreyer, Britta, Elger, Kirsten, Fenner, Martin, Hagemann-Wilholt, Stephanie, Hartmann, Sarah, Höhnow, Tobias, Kett, Jürgen, Pampel, Heinz, Pietsch, Christian, Schirrwagen, Jochen, Summann, Friedrich
[No abstract available]
Herbst TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshops - Metadaten Best Practice
2021-11-09, Taller, Nelli, Dreyer, Britta, Burger, Felix, Hagemann-Wilholt, Stephanie
Folien für den virtuellen Workshop "Herbst TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshops - Metadaten Best Practice".
Concept for Setting up the Persistent Identifier Services Working Group in the NFDI Section "Common Infrastructures"
2022, Bingert, Sven, Brase, Jan, Burger, Felix, Dreyer, Britta, Hagemann-Wilholt, Stephanie, Vierkant, Paul, Wieder, Philipp
The aim of this NFDI working group is to develop a common strategy for the implementation and extension of PID services that is closely aligned with the needs of NFDI consortia. Resulting solutions should enable FAIR research workflows balancing out generic metadata requirements for PIDs that maximise resource discoverability on the one hand and subject-specific needs on the other. At the technical level, the partners want to realise interoperability between PID types and established systems and build on a high level of maturity here; jointly developed services should be able to be rolled out for the entire NFDI.
Do researchers need to care about PID systems?
2018, Kraft, Angelina, Dreyer, Britta
A survey across 1400 scientists in the natural sciences and engineering across Germany conducted in 2016 revealed that although more than 70 % of the researchers are using DOIs for journal publications, less than 10% use DOIs for research data. To the question of why they are not using DOIs more than half (56%) answered that they don’t know about the option to use DOIs for other publications (datasets, conference papers etc.) Therefore it is not surprising that the majority (57 %) stated that they had no need for DOI counselling services. 40% of the questioned researchers need more information and almost 30% cannot see a benefit. Publishers have been using PID systems for articles for years, and the DOI registration and citation are a natural part of the standard publication workflow. With the new digital age, the possibilities to publishing digital research objects beyond articles are bigger than ever – but the respective infrastructure providers are still struggling to provide integrated PID services. Infrastructure providers need to learn from publishers and offer integrated PID services, complementing existing workflows, using researcher’s vocabulary to support usability and promotion. Sell the benefit and enable researchers to focus on what they are best at: Do research (and not worry about the rest)!
PID Network Deutschland: Netzwerk für die Förderung von persistenten Identifikatoren in Wissenschaft und Kultur
2023, Bertelmann, Roland, Buys, Matthew, Kett, Jürgen, Pampel, Heinz, Pieper, Dirk, Scholze, Frank, Sens, Irina, Burger, Felix, Dreyer, Britta, Glagla-Dietz, Stephanie, Hagemann- Wilholt, Stephanie, Hartmann, Sarah, Schrader, Antonia C., Schirrwagen, Jochen, Summann, Friedrich, Vierkant, Paul
[No abstract available]