2020, Smith, Steven J., Chateau, Jean, Dorheim, Kalyn, Drouet, Laurent, Durand-Lasserve, Olivier, Fricko, Oliver, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Hanaoka, Tatsuya, Harmsen, Mathijs, Hilaire, Jérôme, Keramidas, Kimon, Klimont, Zbigniew, Luderer, Gunnar, Moura, Maria Cecilia P., Riahi, Keywan, Rogelj, Joeri, Sano, Fuminori, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Wada, Kenichi

The relatively short atmospheric lifetimes of methane (CH4) and black carbon (BC) have focused attention on the potential for reducing anthropogenic climate change by reducing Short-Lived Climate Forcer (SLCF) emissions. This paper examines radiative forcing and global mean temperature results from the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF)-30 multi-model suite of scenarios addressing CH4 and BC mitigation, the two major short-lived climate forcers. Central estimates of temperature reductions in 2040 from an idealized scenario focused on reductions in methane and black carbon emissions ranged from 0.18–0.26 °C across the nine participating models. Reductions in methane emissions drive 60% or more of these temperature reductions by 2040, although the methane impact also depends on auxiliary reductions that depend on the economic structure of the model. Climate model parameter uncertainty has a large impact on results, with SLCF reductions resulting in as much as 0.3–0.7 °C by 2040. We find that the substantial overlap between a SLCF-focused policy and a stringent and comprehensive climate policy that reduces greenhouse gas emissions means that additional SLCF emission reductions result in, at most, a small additional benefit of ~ 0.1 °C in the 2030–2040 time frame. © 2020, Battelle Memorial Institute.

2021-6-29, Bertram, Christoph, Riahi, Keywan, Hilaire, Jérôme, Bosetti, Valentina, Drouet, Laurent, Fricko, Oliver, Malik, Aman, Pupo Nogueira, Larissa, van der Zwaan, Bob, van Ruijven, Bas, van Vuuren, Detlef, Weitzel, Matthias, Dalla Longa, Francesco, de Boer, Harmen-Sytze, Emmerling, Johannes, Fosse, Florian, Fragkiadakis, Kostas, Harmsen, Mathijs, Keramidas, Kimon, Kishimoto, Paul Natsuo, Kriegler, Elmar, Krey, Volker, Paroussos, Leonidas, Saygin, Deger, Vrontisi, Zoi, Luderer, Gunnar

The Paris Agreement does not only stipulate to limit the global average temperature increase to well below 2 °C, it also calls for 'making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions'. Consequently, there is an urgent need to understand the implications of climate targets for energy systems and quantify the associated investment requirements in the coming decade. A meaningful analysis must however consider the near-term mitigation requirements to avoid the overshoot of a temperature goal. It must also include the recently observed fast technological progress in key mitigation options. Here, we use a new and unique scenario ensemble that limit peak warming by construction and that stems from seven up-to-date integrated assessment models. This allows us to study the near-term implications of different limits to peak temperature increase under a consistent and up-to-date set of assumptions. We find that ambitious immediate action allows for limiting median warming outcomes to well below 2 °C in all models. By contrast, current nationally determined contributions for 2030 would add around 0.2 °C of peak warming, leading to an unavoidable transgression of 1.5 °C in all models, and 2 °C in some. In contrast to the incremental changes as foreseen by current plans, ambitious peak warming targets require decisive emission cuts until 2030, with the most substantial contribution to decarbonization coming from the power sector. Therefore, investments into low-carbon power generation need to increase beyond current levels to meet the Paris goals, especially for solar and wind technologies and related system enhancements for electricity transmission, distribution and storage. Estimates on absolute investment levels, up-scaling of other low-carbon power generation technologies and investment shares in less ambitious scenarios vary considerably across models. In scenarios limiting peak warming to below 2 °C, while coal is phased out quickly, oil and gas are still being used significantly until 2030, albeit at lower than current levels. This requires continued investments into existing oil and gas infrastructure, but investments into new fields in such scenarios might not be needed. The results show that credible and effective policy action is essential for ensuring efficient allocation of investments aligned with medium-term climate targets.

2020, Roelfsema, Mark, van Soest, Heleen L., Harmsen, Mathijs, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Bertram, Christoph, den Elzen, Michel, Höhne, Niklas, Iacobuta, Gabriela, Krey, Volker, Kriegler, Elmar, Luderer, Gunnar, Riahi, Keywan, Ueckerdt, Falko, Després, Jacques, Drouet, Laurent, Emmerling, Johannes, Frank, Stefan, Fricko, Oliver, Gidden, Matthew, Humpenöder, Florian, Huppmann, Daniel, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Fragkiadakis, Kostas, Gi, Keii, Keramidas, Kimon, Köberle, Alexandre C., Aleluia Reis, Lara, Rochedo, Pedro, Schaeffer, Roberto, Oshiro, Ken, Vrontisi, Zoi, Chen, Wenying, Iyer, Gokul C., Edmonds, Jae, Kannavou, Maria, Jiang, Kejun, Mathur, Ritu, Safonov, George, Vishwanathan, Saritha Sudharmma

Many countries have implemented national climate policies to accomplish pledged Nationally Determined Contributions and to contribute to the temperature objectives of the Paris Agreement on climate change. In 2023, the global stocktake will assess the combined effort of countries. Here, based on a public policy database and a multi-model scenario analysis, we show that implementation of current policies leaves a median emission gap of 22.4 to 28.2 GtCO2eq by 2030 with the optimal pathways to implement the well below 2 °C and 1.5 °C Paris goals. If Nationally Determined Contributions would be fully implemented, this gap would be reduced by a third. Interestingly, the countries evaluated were found to not achieve their pledged contributions with implemented policies (implementation gap), or to have an ambition gap with optimal pathways towards well below 2 °C. This shows that all countries would need to accelerate the implementation of policies for renewable technologies, while efficiency improvements are especially important in emerging countries and fossil-fuel-dependent countries.

2021, Rafaj, Peter, Kiesewetter, Gregor, Krey, Volker, Schoepp, Wolfgang, Bertram, Christoph, Drouet, Laurent, Fricko, Oliver, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Harmsen, Mathijs, Hilaire, Jérôme, Huppmann, Daniel, Klimont, Zbigniew, Kolp, Peter, Aleluia Reis, Lara, van Vuuren, Detlef

We have identified an error in the text of section 3.3 where the health co-benefits of 1.5 °C + MFR scenario in the whole of Asia are compared to the reference. In the last paragraph of the section 3.3 (page 11), the manuscript states that 'Across the Asia domain, this reduction is approximately 2.5-3 million cases or 40%-51% depending on the IAM used'. Unfortunately, the numbers quoted here were accidentally taken from a sensitivity analysis using different integrated exposure-response curves (GBD-2010, obtained from Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network 2013), which have not been used in the results shown in the paper-our results are based on the GBD-2013 version, reported by Forouzanfar et al (2015). The correct statement is: 'Across the Asia domain, this reduction is approximately 1.2-1.5 million cases or 33%-42% depending on the IAM used'. The same correction applies to the statement in the Conclusions section 5 (4th paragraph, page 14), which should read: 'The 1.5 °C + MFR scenario decreases premature deaths by 33%-42% across Asia, compared to NPi'.