2020, Laj, Paolo, Bigi, Alessandro, Rose, Clémence, Andrews, Elisabeth, Lund Myhre, Cathrine, Collaud Coen, Martine, Lin, Yong, Wiedensohler, Alfred, Schulz, Michael, Ogren, John A., Fiebig, Markus, Prenni, Anthony, Reisen, Fabienne, Romano, Salvatore, Sellegri, Karine, Sharma, Sangeeta, Schauer, Gerhard, Sheridan, Patrick, Sherman, James Patrick, Schütze, Maik, Schwerin, Andreas, Tuch, Thomas, Sohmer, Ralf, Sorribas, Mar, Steinbacher, Martin, Sun, Junying, Titos, Gloria, Toczko, Barbara, Tulet, Pierre, Tunved, Peter, Vakkari, Ville, Velarde, Fernando, Velasquez, Patricio, Villani, Paolo, Vratolis, Sterios, Wang, Sheng-Hsiang, Weinhold, Kay, Gliß, Jonas, Weller, Rolf, Yela, Margarita, Yus-Diez, Jesus, Zdimal, Vladimir, Zieger, Paul, Zikova, Nadezda, Mortier, Augustin, Pandolfi, Marco, Petäja, Tuukka, Kim, Sang-Woo, Aas, Wenche, Putaud, Jean-Philippe, Mayol-Bracero, Olga, Keywood, Melita, Labrador, Lorenzo, Aalto, Pasi, Ahlberg, Erik, Alados Arboledas, Lucas, Alastuey, Andrés, Andrade, Marcos, Artíñano, Begoña, Ausmeel, Stina, Arsov, Todor, Asmi, Eija, Backman, John, Baltensperger, Urs, Bastian, Susanne, Bath, Olaf, Beukes, Johan Paul, Brem, Benjamin T., Bukowiecki, Nicolas, Conil, Sébastien, Couret, Cedric, Day, Derek, Dayantolis, Wan, Degorska, Anna, Eleftheriadis, Konstantinos, Fetfatzis, Prodromos, Favez, Olivier, Flentje, Harald, Gini, Maria I., Gregorič, Asta, Gysel-Beer, Martin, Hallar, A. Gannet, Hand, Jenny, Hoffer, Andras, Hueglin, Christoph, Hooda, Rakesh K., Hyvärinen, Antti, Kalapov, Ivo, Kalivitis, Nikos, Kasper-Giebl, Anne, Kim, Jeong Eun, Kouvarakis, Giorgos, Kranjc, Irena, Krejci, Radovan, Kulmala, Markku, Labuschagne, Casper, Lee, Hae-Jung, Lihavainen, Heikki, Lin, Neng-Huei, Löschau, Gunter, Luoma, Krista, Marinoni, Angela, Martins Dos Santos, Sebastiao, Meinhardt, Frank, Merkel, Maik, Metzger, Jean-Marc, Mihalopoulos, Nikolaos, Nguyen, Nhat Anh, Ondracek, Jakub, Pérez, Noemi, Perrone, Maria Rita, Petit, Jean-Eudes, Picard, David, Pichon, Jean-Marc, Pont, Veronique, Prats, Natalia

Aerosol particles are essential constituents of the Earth's atmosphere, impacting the earth radiation balance directly by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, and indirectly by acting as cloud condensation nuclei. In contrast to most greenhouse gases, aerosol particles have short atmospheric residence times, resulting in a highly heterogeneous distribution in space and time. There is a clear need to document this variability at regional scale through observations involving, in particular, the in situ near-surface segment of the atmospheric observation system. This paper will provide the widest effort so far to document variability of climate-relevant in situ aerosol properties (namely wavelength dependent particle light scattering and absorption coefficients, particle number concentration and particle number size distribution) from all sites connected to the Global Atmosphere Watch network. High-quality data from almost 90 stations worldwide have been collected and controlled for quality and are reported for a reference year in 2017, providing a very extended and robust view of the variability of these variables worldwide. The range of variability observed worldwide for light scattering and absorption coefficients, single-scattering albedo, and particle number concentration are presented together with preliminary information on their long-term trends and comparison with model simulation for the different stations. The scope of the present paper is also to provide the necessary suite of information, including data provision procedures, quality control and analysis, data policy, and usage of the ground-based aerosol measurement network. It delivers to users of the World Data Centre on Aerosol, the required confidence in data products in the form of a fully characterized value chain, including uncertainty estimation and requirements for contributing to the global climate monitoring system.

2022, Leinonen, Ville, Kokkola, Harri, Yli-Juuti, Taina, Mielonen, Tero, Kühn, Thomas, Nieminen, Tuomo, Heikkinen, Simo, Miinalainen, Tuuli, Bergman, Tommi, Carslaw, Ken, Decesari, Stefano, Fiebig, Markus, Hussein, Tareq, Kivekäs, Niku, Krejci, Radovan, Kulmala, Markku, Leskinen, Ari, Massling, Andreas, Mihalopoulos, Nikos, Mulcahy, Jane P., Noe, Steffen M., van Noije, Twan, O'Connor, Fiona M., O'Dowd, Colin, Olivie, Dirk, Pernov, Jakob B., Petäjä, Tuukka, Seland, Øyvind, Schulz, Michael, Scott, Catherine E., Skov, Henrik, Swietlicki, Erik, Tuch, Thomas, Wiedensohler, Alfred, Virtanen, Annele, Mikkonen, Santtu

Despite a large number of studies, out of all drivers of radiative forcing, the effect of aerosols has the largest uncertainty in global climate model radiative forcing estimates. There have been studies of aerosol optical properties in climate models, but the effects of particle number size distribution need a more thorough inspection. We investigated the trends and seasonality of particle number concentrations in nucleation, Aitken, and accumulation modes at 21 measurement sites in Europe and the Arctic. For 13 of those sites, with longer measurement time series, we compared the field observations with the results from five climate models, namely EC-Earth3, ECHAM-M7, ECHAM-SALSA, NorESM1.2, and UKESM1. This is the first extensive comparison of detailed aerosol size distribution trends between in situ observations from Europe and five earth system models (ESMs). We found that the trends of particle number concentrations were mostly consistent and decreasing in both measurements and models. However, for many sites, climate models showed weaker decreasing trends than the measurements. Seasonal variability in measured number concentrations, quantified by the ratio between maximum and minimum monthly number concentration, was typically stronger at northern measurement sites compared to other locations. Models had large differences in their seasonal representation, and they can be roughly divided into two categories: for EC-Earth and NorESM, the seasonal cycle was relatively similar for all sites, and for other models the pattern of seasonality varied between northern and southern sites. In addition, the variability in concentrations across sites varied between models, some having relatively similar concentrations for all sites, whereas others showed clear differences in concentrations between remote and urban sites. To conclude, although all of the model simulations had identical input data to describe anthropogenic mass emissions, trends in differently sized particles vary among the models due to assumptions in emission sizes and differences in how models treat size-dependent aerosol processes. The inter-model variability was largest in the accumulation mode, i.e. sizes which have implications for aerosol-cloud interactions. Our analysis also indicates that between models there is a large variation in efficiency of long-range transportation of aerosols to remote locations. The differences in model results are most likely due to the more complex effect of different processes instead of one specific feature (e.g. the representation of aerosol or emission size distributions). Hence, a more detailed characterization of microphysical processes and deposition processes affecting the long-range transport is needed to understand the model variability.