Search Results
Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?
2017, Reyer, Christopher P.O., Bathgate, Stephen, Blennow, Kristina, Borges, Jose G., Bugmann, Harald, Delzon, Sylvain, Faias, Sonia P., Garcia-Gonzalo, Jordi, Gardiner, Barry, Gonzalez-Olabarria, Jose Ramon, Gracia, Carlos, Hernández, Juan Guerra, Kellomäki, Seppo, Kramer, Koen, Lexer, Manfred J., Lindner, Marcus, van der Maaten, Ernst, Maroschek, Michael, Muys, Bart, Nicoll, Bruce, Palahi, Marc, Palma, João HN, Paulo, Joana A., Peltola, Heli, Pukkala, Timo, Rammer, Werner, Ray, Duncan, Sabaté, Santiago, Schelhaas, Mart-Jan, Seidl, Rupert, Temperli, Christian, Tomé, Margarida, Yousefpour, Rasoul, Zimmermann, Niklaus E., Hanewinkel, Marc
Recent studies projecting future climate change impacts on forests mainly consider either the effects of climate change on productivity or on disturbances. However, productivity and disturbances are intrinsically linked because 1) disturbances directly affect forest productivity (e.g. via a reduction in leaf area, growing stock or resource-use efficiency), and 2) disturbance susceptibility is often coupled to a certain development phase of the forest with productivity determining the time a forest is in this specific phase of susceptibility. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of forest productivity changes in different forest regions in Europe under climate change, and partition these changes into effects induced by climate change alone and by climate change and disturbances. We present projections of climate change impacts on forest productivity from state-of-the-art forest models that dynamically simulate forest productivity and the effects of the main European disturbance agents (fire, storm, insects), driven by the same climate scenario in seven forest case studies along a large climatic gradient throughout Europe. Our study shows that, in most cases, including disturbances in the simulations exaggerate ongoing productivity declines or cancel out productivity gains in response to climate change. In fewer cases, disturbances also increase productivity or buffer climate-change induced productivity losses, e.g. because low severity fires can alleviate resource competition and increase fertilization. Even though our results cannot simply be extrapolated to other types of forests and disturbances, we argue that it is necessary to interpret climate change-induced productivity and disturbance changes jointly to capture the full range of climate change impacts on forests and to plan adaptation measures.
Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950
2022, Patacca, Marco, Lindner, Marcus, Lucas‐Borja, Manuel Esteban, Cordonnier, Thomas, Fidej, Gal, Gardiner, Barry, Hauf, Ylva, Jasinevičius, Gediminas, Labonne, Sophie, Linkevičius, Edgaras, Mahnken, Mats, Milanovic, Slobodan, Nabuurs, Gert‐Jan, Nagel, Thomas A., Nikinmaa, Laura, Panyatov, Momchil, Bercak, Roman, Seidl, Rupert, Ostrogović Sever, Masa Zorana, Socha, Jaroslaw, Thom, Dominik, Vuletic, Dijana, Zudin, Sergey, Schelhaas, Mart‐Jan
Over the last decades, the natural disturbance is increasingly putting pressure on European forests. Shifts in disturbance regimes may compromise forest functioning and the continuous provisioning of ecosystem services to society, including their climate change mitigation potential. Although forests are central to many European policies, we lack the long-term empirical data needed for thoroughly understanding disturbance dynamics, modeling them, and developing adaptive management strategies. Here, we present a unique database of >170,000 records of ground-based natural disturbance observations in European forests from 1950 to 2019. Reported data confirm a significant increase in forest disturbance in 34 European countries, causing on an average of 43.8 million m3 of disturbed timber volume per year over the 70-year study period. This value is likely a conservative estimate due to under-reporting, especially of small-scale disturbances. We used machine learning techniques for assessing the magnitude of unreported disturbances, which are estimated to be between 8.6 and 18.3 million m3/year. In the last 20 years, disturbances on average accounted for 16% of the mean annual harvest in Europe. Wind was the most important disturbance agent over the study period (46% of total damage), followed by fire (24%) and bark beetles (17%). Bark beetle disturbance doubled its share of the total damage in the last 20 years. Forest disturbances can profoundly impact ecosystem services (e.g., climate change mitigation), affect regional forest resource provisioning and consequently disrupt long-term management planning objectives and timber markets. We conclude that adaptation to changing disturbance regimes must be placed at the core of the European forest management and policy debate. Furthermore, a coherent and homogeneous monitoring system of natural disturbances is urgently needed in Europe, to better observe and respond to the ongoing changes in forest disturbance regimes.