2016, Wandinger, Ulla, Freudenthaler, Volker, Baars, Holger, Amodeo, Aldo, Engelmann, Ronny, Mattis, Ina, Groß, Silke, Pappalardo, Gelsomina, Giunta, Aldo, D'Amico, Giuseppe, Chaikovsky, Anatoli, Osipenko, Fiodor, Slesar, Alexander, Nicolae, Doina, Belegante, Livio, Talianu, Camelia, Serikov, Ilya, Linné, Holger, Jansen, Friedhelm, Apituley, Arnoud, Wilson, Keith M., de Graaf, Martin, Trickl, Thomas, Giehl, Helmut, Adam, Mariana, Comerón, Adolfo, Muñoz-Porcar, Constantino, Rocadenbosch, Francesc, Sicard, Michaël, Tomás, Sergio, Lange, Diego, Kumar, Dhiraj, Pujadas, Manuel, Molero, Francisco, Fernández, Alfonso J., Alados-Arboledas, Lucas, Bravo-Aranda, Juan Antonio, Navas-Guzmán, Francisco, Guerrero-Rascado, Juan Luis, Granados-Muñoz, María José, Preißler, Jana, Wagner, Frank, Gausa, Michael, Grigorov, Ivan, Stoyanov, Dimitar, Iarlori, Marco, Rizi, Vincenco, Spinelli, Nicola, Boselli, Antonella, Wang, Xuan, Feudo, Teresa Lo, Perrone, Maria Rita, De Tomas, Ferdinando, Burlizzi, Pasquale

This paper introduces the recent European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) quality-assurance efforts at instrument level. Within two dedicated campaigns and five single-site intercomparison activities, 21 EARLINET systems from 18 EARLINET stations were intercompared between 2009 and 2013. A comprehensive strategy for campaign setup and data evaluation has been established. Eleven systems from nine EARLINET stations participated in the EARLINET Lidar Intercomparison 2009 (EARLI09). In this campaign, three reference systems were qualified which served as traveling standards thereafter. EARLINET systems from nine other stations have been compared against these reference systems since 2009. We present and discuss comparisons at signal and at product level from all campaigns for more than 100 individual measurement channels at the wavelengths of 355, 387, 532, and 607 nm. It is shown that in most cases, a very good agreement of the compared systems with the respective reference is obtained. Mean signal deviations in predefined height ranges are typically below ±2 %. Particle backscatter and extinction coefficients agree within ±2  ×  10−4 km−1 sr−1 and ± 0.01 km−1, respectively, in most cases. For systems or channels that showed larger discrepancies, an in-depth analysis of deficiencies was performed and technical solutions and upgrades were proposed and realized. The intercomparisons have reinforced confidence in the EARLINET data quality and allowed us to draw conclusions on necessary system improvements for some instruments and to identify major challenges that need to be tackled in the future.

2016, Granados-Muñoz, María José, Navas-Guzmán, Francisco, Guerrero-Rascado, Juan Luis, Bravo-Aranda, Juan Antonio, Pereira, Sergio Nepomuceno, Basart, Sara, Baldasano, José María, Belegante, Livio, Chaikovsky, Anatoli, Comerón, Adolfo, D'Amico, Giuseppe, Dubovik, Oleg, Ilic, Luka, Kokkalis, Panos, Muñoz-Porcar, Constantino, Nickovic, Slobodan, Nicolae, Doina, Facchini, Maria Cristina, Olmo, Francisco José, Papayannis, Alexander, Pappalardo, Gelsomina, Rodríguez, Alejandro, Schepanski, Kerstin, Sicard, Michaël, Vukovic, Ana, Wandinger, Ulla, Dulac, François, Alados-Arboledas, Lucas

The simultaneous analysis of aerosol microphysical properties profiles at different European stations is made in the framework of the ChArMEx/EMEP 2012 field campaign (9–11 July 2012). During and in support of this campaign, five lidar ground-based stations (Athens, Barcelona, Bucharest, Évora, and Granada) performed 72 h of continuous lidar measurements and collocated and coincident sun-photometer measurements. Therefore it was possible to retrieve volume concentration profiles with the Lidar Radiometer Inversion Code (LIRIC). Results indicated the presence of a mineral dust plume affecting the western Mediterranean region (mainly the Granada station), whereas a different aerosol plume was observed over the Balkans area. LIRIC profiles showed a predominance of coarse spheroid particles above Granada, as expected for mineral dust, and an aerosol plume composed mainly of fine and coarse spherical particles above Athens and Bucharest. Due to the exceptional characteristics of the ChArMEx database, the analysis of the microphysical properties profiles' temporal evolution was also possible. An in-depth analysis was performed mainly at the Granada station because of the availability of continuous lidar measurements and frequent AERONET inversion retrievals. The analysis at Granada was of special interest since the station was affected by mineral dust during the complete analyzed period. LIRIC was found to be a very useful tool for performing continuous monitoring of mineral dust, allowing for the analysis of the dynamics of the dust event in the vertical and temporal coordinates. Results obtained here illustrate the importance of having collocated and simultaneous advanced lidar and sun-photometer measurements in order to characterize the aerosol microphysical properties in both the vertical and temporal coordinates at a regional scale. In addition, this study revealed that the use of the depolarization information as input in LIRIC in the stations of Bucharest, Évora, and Granada was crucial for the characterization of the aerosol types and their distribution in the vertical column, whereas in stations lacking depolarization lidar channels, ancillary information was needed. Results obtained were also used for the validation of different mineral dust models. In general, the models better forecast the vertical distribution of the mineral dust than the column-integrated mass concentration, which was underestimated in most of the cases.

2016, Bravo-Aranda, Juan Antonio, Belegante, Livio, Freudenthaler, Volker, Alados-Arboledas, Lucas, Nicolae, Doina, Granados-Muñoz, María José, Guerrero-Rascado, Juan Luis, Amodeo, Aldo, D'Amico, Giusseppe, Engelmann, Ronny, Pappalardo, Gelsomina, Kokkalis, Panos, Mamouri, Rodanthy, Papayannis, Alex, Navas-Guzmán, Francisco, Olmo, Francisco José, Wandinger, Ulla, Amato, Francesco, Haeffelin, Martial

Lidar depolarization measurements distinguish between spherical and non-spherical aerosol particles based on the change of the polarization state between the emitted and received signal. The particle shape information in combination with other aerosol optical properties allows the characterization of different aerosol types and the retrieval of aerosol particle microphysical properties. Regarding the microphysical inversions, the lidar depolarization technique is becoming a key method since particle shape information can be used by algorithms based on spheres and spheroids, optimizing the retrieval procedure. Thus, the identification of the depolarization error sources and the quantification of their effects are crucial. This work presents a new tool to assess the systematic error of the volume linear depolarization ratio (δ), combining the Stokes–Müller formalism and the complete sampling of the error space using the lidar model presented in Freudenthaler (2016a). This tool is applied to a synthetic lidar system and to several EARLINET lidars with depolarization capabilities at 355 or 532 nm. The lidar systems show relative errors of δ larger than 100 % for δ values around molecular linear depolarization ratios (∼ 0.004 and up to ∼  10 % for δ = 0.45). However, one system shows only relative errors of 25 and 0.22 % for δ = 0.004 and δ = 0.45, respectively, and gives an example of how a proper identification and reduction of the main error sources can drastically reduce the systematic errors of δ. In this regard, we provide some indications of how to reduce the systematic errors.

2017, Ortiz-Amezcua, Pablo, Guerrero-Rascado, Juan Luis, Granados-Muñoz, María José, Benavent-Oltra, José Antonio, Böckmann, Christine, Samaras, Stefanos, Stachlewska, Iwona S., Janicka, Łucja, Baars, Holger, Bohlmann, Stephanie, Alados-Arboledas, Lucas

Strong events of long-range transported biomass burning aerosol were detected during July 2013 at three EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar Network) stations, namely Granada (Spain), Leipzig (Germany) and Warsaw (Poland). Satellite observations from MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) and CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) instruments, as well as modeling tools such as HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) and NAAPS (Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System), have been used to estimate the sources and transport paths of those North American forest fire smoke particles. A multiwavelength Raman lidar technique was applied to obtain vertically resolved particle optical properties, and further inversion of those properties with a regularization algorithm allowed for retrieving microphysical information on the studied particles. The results highlight the presence of smoke layers of 1-2 km thickness, located at about 5 km a.s.l. altitude over Granada and Leipzig and around 2.5 km a.s.l. at Warsaw. These layers were intense, as they accounted for more than 30 % of the total AOD (aerosol optical depth) in all cases, and presented optical and microphysical features typical for different aging degrees: Color ratio of lidar ratios (LR532/LR355) around 2, α-related ängström exponents of less than 1, effective radii of 0.3 μm and large values of single scattering albedos (SSA), nearly spectrally independent. The intensive microphysical properties were compared with columnar retrievals form co-located AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) stations. The intensity of the layers was also characterized in terms of particle volume concentration, and then an experimental relationship between this magnitude and the particle extinction coefficient was established.

2016, Chaikovsky, Anatoli, Dubovik, Oleg, Holben, Brent, Bril, Andrey, Goloub, Philippe, Tanré, Didier, Pappalardo, Gelsomina, Wandinger, Ulla, Chaikovskaya, Ludmila, Denisov, Sergey, Grudo, Jan, Lopatin, Anton, Karol, Yana, Lapyonok, Tatsiana, Amiridis, Vassilis, Ansmann, Albert, Apituley, Arnoud, Allados-Arboledas, Lucas, Binietoglou, Ioannis, Boselli, Antonella, D'Amico, Giuseppe, Freudenthaler, Volker, Giles, David, Granados-Muñoz, María José, Kokkalis, Panayotis, Nicolae, Doina, Oshchepkov, Sergey, Papayannis, Alex, Perrone, Maria Rita, Pietruczuk, Alexander, Rocadenbosch, Francesc, Sicard, Michaël, Slutsker, Ilya, Talianu, Camelia, De Tomasi, Ferdinando, Tsekeri, Alexandra, Wagner, Janet, Wang, Xuan

This paper presents a detailed description of LIRIC (LIdar-Radiometer Inversion Code) algorithm for simultaneous processing of coincident lidar and radiometric (sun photometric) observations for the retrieval of the aerosol concentration vertical profiles. As the lidar/radiometric input data we use measurements from European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) lidars and collocated sun-photometers of Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The LIRIC data processing provides sequential inversion of the combined lidar and radiometric data. The algorithm starts with the estimations of column-integrated aerosol parameters from radiometric measurements followed by the retrieval of height dependent concentrations of fine and coarse aerosols from lidar signals using integrated column characteristics of aerosol layer as a priori constraints. The use of polarized lidar observations allows us to discriminate between spherical and non-spherical particles of the coarse aerosol mode. The LIRIC software package was implemented and tested at a number of EARLINET stations. Intercomparison of the LIRIC-based aerosol retrievals was performed for the observations by seven EARLINET lidars in Leipzig, Germany on 25 May 2009. We found close agreement between the aerosol parameters derived from different lidars that supports high robustness of the LIRIC algorithm. The sensitivity of the retrieval results to the possible reduction of the available observation data is also discussed.