Search Results
Optical microresonator arrays of fluorescence-switchable diarylethenes with unreplicable spectral fingerprints
2020, Okada, Daichi, Lin, Zhan-Hong, Huang, Jer-Shing, Oki, Osamu, Morimoto, Masakazu, Liu, Xuying, Minari, Takeo, Ishii, Satoshi, Nagao, Tadaaki, Irie, Masahiro, Yamamoto, Yohei
High-security identification requires authentication that is hard to counterfeit and replicate. For anti-counterfeiting data storage and rewritable memory devices, chromic materials are adoptable, where the dichromatic colours can be switched by external stimuli. If further individual information is embedded in each pixel, a much higher-level security system beyond the zero/one data array will be realized. For this purpose, a fine whispering gallery mode (WGM) fingerprint pattern from a microresonator is applicable. Here we propose that photoswitchable optical microresonators made of a fluorescent photochromic organic material function as anti-counterfeiting, rewritable optical memories. The WGM photoluminescence of the resultant microspheres can be switched on and off repeatedly by irradiation with ultraviolet and visible light. The shape of the microresonator varies from a sphere to an oblate ellipsoid and hemisphere, depending on the self-assembly process, and the WGM spectral pattern depends sensitively on the morphology of the resonators. Furthermore, surface self-assembly on a hydrophobic/hydrophilic micropatterned substrate affords a highly integrated array of microresonators as dense as millions of pixels per square centimetre. The spectral fingerprints of all pixels are different from one another; therefore, the photoswitchable microarrays are applicable as an ultimate anti-counterfeiting system which is hard to replicate. This journal is © 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Correction: Design and characterization of a plasmonic Doppler grating for azimuthal angle-resolved surface plasmon resonances
2021, See, Kel-Meng, Lin, Fan-Cheng, Huang, Jer-Shing
The authors regret that Fig. 1e of the original paper contained an error in the curves displayed for the silver, aluminium and palladium gratings. Specifically, a different value of the ‘index of the environment’ (1.65) was used in the calculation of these curves compared to that used for calculating the optical response of the gold grating (1.33). The correct Fig. 1 below, displays the curves calculated with the same value of the index of the environment (1.33). No amendments are made to the caption of Fig. 1 or the other sub-figures presented in the figure. This error does not affect any of the results or conclusions reported in the paper; only the display of the figure. (Figure Presented) The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.