Filters

2016 - 20182

More filters

2022 - 20232
Reset filters

Settings

Author: Kollias, Pavlos ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Fingerprints of a riming event on cloud radar Doppler spectra: Observations and modeling
    (Katlenburg-Lindau : EGU, 2016) Kalesse, Heike; Szyrmer, Wanda; Kneifel, Stefan; Kollias, Pavlos; Luke, Edward
    Radar Doppler spectra measurements are exploited to study a riming event when precipitating ice from a seeder cloud sediment through a supercooled liquid water (SLW) layer. The focus is on the "golden sample" case study for this type of analysis based on observations collected during the deployment of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program's (ARM) mobile facility AMF2 at Hyytiälä, Finland, during the Biogenic Aerosols – Effects on Clouds and Climate (BAECC) field campaign. The presented analysis of the height evolution of the radar Doppler spectra is a state-of-the-art retrieval with profiling cloud radars in SLW layers beyond the traditional use of spectral moments. Dynamical effects are considered by following the particle population evolution along slanted tracks that are caused by horizontal advection of the cloud under wind shear conditions. In the SLW layer, the identified liquid peak is used as an air motion tracer to correct the Doppler spectra for vertical air motion and the ice peak is used to study the radar profiles of rimed particles. A 1-D steady-state bin microphysical model is constrained using the SLW and air motion profiles and cloud top radar observations. The observed radar moment profiles of the rimed snow can be simulated reasonably well by the model, but not without making several assumptions about the ice particle concentration and the relative role of deposition and aggregation. This suggests that in situ observations of key ice properties are needed to complement the profiling radar observations before process-oriented studies can effectively evaluate ice microphysical parameterizations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives
    (Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2018) Grosvenor, Daniel P.; Sourdeval, Odran; Zuidema, Paquita; Ackerman, Andrew; Alexandrov, Mikhail D.; Bennartz, Ralf; Boers, Reinout; Cairns, Brian; Chiu, J. Christine; Christensen, Matthew; Deneke, Hartwig; Diamond, Michael; Feingold, Graham; Fridlind, Ann; Hünerbein, Anja; Knist, Christine; Kollias, Pavlos; Marshak, Alexander; McCoy, Daniel; Merk, Daniel; Painemal, David; Rausch, John; Rosenfeld, Daniel; Russchenberg, Herman; Seifert, Patric; Sinclair, Kenneth; Stier, Philip; van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan; Wendisch, Manfred; Werner, Frank; Wood, Robert; Zhang, Zhibo; Quaas, Johannes
    The cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) is of central interest to improve the understanding of cloud physics and for quantifying the effective radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions. Current standard satellite retrievals do not operationally provide Nd, but it can be inferred from retrievals of cloud optical depth (Ï„c) cloud droplet effective radius (re) and cloud top temperature. This review summarizes issues with this approach and quantifies uncertainties. A total relative uncertainty of 78% is inferred for pixel-level retrievals for relatively homogeneous, optically thick and unobscured stratiform clouds with favorable viewing geometry. The uncertainty is even greater if these conditions are not met. For averages over 1° ×1° regions the uncertainty is reduced to 54% assuming random errors for instrument uncertainties. In contrast, the few evaluation studies against reference in situ observations suggest much better accuracy with little variability in the bias. More such studies are required for a better error characterization. Nd uncertainty is dominated by errors in re, and therefore, improvements in re retrievals would greatly improve the quality of the Nd retrievals. Recommendations are made for how this might be achieved. Some existing Nd data sets are compared and discussed, and best practices for the use of Nd data from current passive instruments (e.g., filtering criteria) are recommended. Emerging alternative Nd estimates are also considered. First, new ideas to use additional information from existing and upcoming spaceborne instruments are discussed, and second, approaches using high-quality ground-based observations are examined.