2017, Kraft, Angelina, Dreyer, Britta, Löwe, Peter, Ziedorn, Frauke

In an ideal research world, any scientific content should be citable and the coherent content, as well as the citation itself, should be persistent. However, today’s scientists do not only produce traditional research papers – they produce comprehensive digital resources and collections. TIB’s mission is to develop a supportive framework for a sustainable access to such digital content – focusing on areas of engineering as well as architecture, chemistry, information technology, mathematics and physics. The term digital content comprises all digitally available resources such as audiovisual media, databases, texts, images, spreadsheets, digital lab journals, multimedia, 3D objects, statistics and software code. In executing this mission, TIB provides services for the management of digital content during ongoing and for finished research. This includes: • a technical and administrative infrastructure for indexing, cataloguing, DOI registration and licensing for text and digital objects, namely the TIB DOI registration which is active since 2005, • the administration of the ORCID DE consortium, an institutional network fostering the adoption of ORCID across academic institutions in Germany, • training and consultancy for data management, complemented with a digital repository for the deposition and provision of accessible, traceable and citable research data (RADAR), • a Research and Development Department where innovative projects focus on the visualization and the sustainable access to digital information, and • the development of a supportive framework within the German research data community which accompanies the life cycle of scientific knowledge generation and transfer. Its goal is to harmonize (meta)data display and exchange primarily on a national level (LEIBNIZ DATA project).

2018, Kraft, Angelina, Dreyer, Britta

A survey across 1400 scientists in the natural sciences and engineering across Germany conducted in 2016 revealed that although more than 70 % of the researchers are using DOIs for journal publications, less than 10% use DOIs for research data. To the question of why they are not using DOIs more than half (56%) answered that they don’t know about the option to use DOIs for other publications (datasets, conference papers etc.) Therefore it is not surprising that the majority (57 %) stated that they had no need for DOI counselling services. 40% of the questioned researchers need more information and almost 30% cannot see a benefit. Publishers have been using PID systems for articles for years, and the DOI registration and citation are a natural part of the standard publication workflow. With the new digital age, the possibilities to publishing digital research objects beyond articles are bigger than ever – but the respective infrastructure providers are still struggling to provide integrated PID services. Infrastructure providers need to learn from publishers and offer integrated PID services, complementing existing workflows, using researcher’s vocabulary to support usability and promotion. Sell the benefit and enable researchers to focus on what they are best at: Do research (and not worry about the rest)!

2017, Drees, Bastian, Kraft, Angelina, Koprucki, Thomas

The demand of reproducible results in the numerical simulation of opto-electronic devices or more general in mathematical modeling and simulation requires the (long-term) accessibility of data and software that were used to generate those results. Moreover, to present those results in a comprehensible manner data visualizations such as videos are useful. Persistent identifier can be used to ensure the permanent connection of these different digital objects thereby preserving all information in the right context. Here we give an overview over the state-of-the art of data preservation, data and software citation and illustrate the benefits and opportunities of enhancing publications with visual simulation data by showing a use case from opto-electronics.

2017, Einbock, Joanna, Dreyer, Britta, Heller, Lambert, Kraft, Angelina, Niemeyer, Sandra, Plank, Margret, Schrenk, Philip, Sens, Irina, Struß, Julia, Tullney, Marco, Bernhofer, Carolin, Häfner, Peter

[no abstract available]

2018, Koepler, Oliver, Jung, Nicole, Kraft, Angelina, Neumann, Janna, Auer, Sören, Bach, Felix, Bähr, Thomas, Engel, Thomas, Kettner, Carsten, Kowol-Santen, Johanna, Liermann, Johannes, Lipp, Anne, Porzel, Andrea, Razum, Matthias, Schlörer, Niels, Solle, Dörte, Winkler, Torsten

“Der stufenweise Aufbau einer Nationalen Forschungsdateninfrastruktur in Netzwerkform hat das Ziel, ein verlässliches und nachhaltiges Dienste-Portfolio zu schaffen, welches generische und fachspezifische Bedarfe des Forschungsdatenmanagements in Deutschland abdeckt.” Für das Fachgebiet Chemie ermöglicht eine solche nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur, öffentlich-finanzierte Forschungsdaten effizient zu erheben, standardisiert zu beschreiben, dauerhaft zu speichern und durch Persistent Identifier (PID) eindeutig referenzierbar und auffindbar zu machen. Sie unterstützt gemäß den Vorgaben des RfII die Reproduzierbarkeit und Nachnutzbarkeit der Daten zum Zwecke einer perpetuierten Wissensgenerierung. Mit der Reproduzierbarkeit von Forschungsergebnissen unterstützt eine solche Forschungsdateninfrastruktur den Peer Reviewing Prozess zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Selbstkontrolle und erhöht die Datenqualität, insbesondere in wissenschaftlichen Publikationen. Die NFDI4Chem ist ein gemeinschaftlicher Ansatz von Wissenschaftlern aus der Chemie, der Fachgesellschaft Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker und deren Fachgruppen, Einrichtungen aus der Forschungsförderung und Infrastruktureinrichtungen (Technische Informationsbibliothek). Eine Gruppe von Vertretern dieser Stakeholder hat sich Ende April 2018 zu einem Auftakttreffen “Fachgespräch NFDI4Chem” in Hannover getroffen. Dieses Papier fasst die Erkenntnisse des Fachgespräches zusammen. Weitere Stakeholder wie Verlage oder Datenbankanbieter sind im folgenden Diskurs willkommen.