Filters

2012 - 20162

More filters

2019 - 201912020 - 20221
Reset filters

Settings

Author: Lack, D. ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Soot reference materials for instrument calibration and intercomparisons: A workshop summary with recommendations
    (München : European Geopyhsical Union, 2012) Baumgardner, D.; Popovicheva, O.; Allan, J.; Bernardoni, V.; Cao, J.; Cavalli, F.; Cozic, J.; Courcoux, Y.; Diapouli, E.; Eleftheriadis, K.; Genberg, P.J.; Gonzalez, C.; Gysel, M.; John, A.; Kirchstetter, T.W.; Kuhlbusch, T.A.J.; Laborde, M.; Lack, D.; Müller, T.; Niessner, R.; Petzold, A.; Piazzalunga, A.; Putaud, J.P.; Schwarz, J.; Sheridan, P.; Subramanian, R.; Swietlicki, E.; Valli, G.; Vecchi, R.; Viana, M.
    Soot, which is produced from biomass burning and the incomplete combustion of fossil and biomass fuels, has been linked to regional and global climate change and to negative health problems. Scientists measure the properties of soot using a variety of methods in order to quantify source emissions and understand its atmospheric chemistry, reactivity under emission conditions, interaction with solar radiation, influence on clouds, and health impacts. A major obstacle currently limiting progress is the absence of established standards or reference materials for calibrating the many instruments used to measure the various properties of soot. The current state of availability and practicability of soot standard reference materials (SRMs) was reviewed by a group of 50 international experts during a workshop in June of 2011. The workshop was convened to summarize the current knowledge on soot measurement techniques, identify the measurement uncertainties and limitations related to the lack of soot SRMs, and identify attributes of SRMs that, if developed, would reduce measurement uncertainties. The workshop established that suitable SRMs are available for calibrating some, but not all, measurement methods. The community of users of the single-particle soot-photometer (SP2), an instrument using laser-induced incandescence, identified a suitable SRM, fullerene soot, but users of instruments that measure light absorption by soot collected on filters did not. Similarly, those who use thermal optical analysis (TOA) to analyze the organic and elemental carbon components of soot were not satisfied with current SRMs. The workshop, and subsequent, interactive discussions, produced a number of recommendations for the development of new SRMs, and their implementation, that would be suitable for the different soot measurement methods.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Instrumentation and Measurement Strategy for the NOAA SENEX Aircraft Campaign as Part of the Southeast Atmosphere Study 2013
    (Katlenburg-Lindau : Copernicus, 2016) Warneke, C.; Trainer, M.; de Gouw, J.A.; Parrish, D.D.; Fahey, D.W.; Ravishankara, A.R.; Middlebrook, A.M.; Brock, C.A.; Roberts, J.M.; Brown, S.S.; Neuman, J.A.; Lerner, B.M.; Lack, D.; Law, D.; Hübler, G.; Pollack, I.; Sjostedt, S.; Ryerson, T.B.; Gilman, J B; Liao, J.; Holloway, J.; Peischl, J.; Nowak, J.B.; Aikin, K.; Min, K.-E.; Washenfelder, R.A.; Graus, M.G.; Richardson, M.; Markovic, M.Z.; Wagner, N.L.; Welti, A.; Veres, P.R.; Edwards, P.; Schwarz, J.P.; Gordon, T.; Dube, W.P.; McKeen, S.; Brioude, J.; Ahmadov, R.; Bougiatioti, A.; Lin, J.J.; Nenes, A.; Wolfe, G.M.; Hanisco, T.F.; Lee, B.H.; Lopez-Hilfiker, F.D.; Thornton, J.A.; Keutsch, F.N.; Kaiser, J.; Mao, J.; Hatch, C.
    Natural emissions of ozone-and-aerosol-precursor gases such as isoprene and monoterpenes are high in the southeast of the US. In addition, anthropogenic emissions are significant in the Southeast US and summertime photochemistry is rapid. The NOAA-led SENEX (Southeast Nexus) aircraft campaign was one of the major components of the Southeast Atmosphere Study (SAS) and was focused on studying the interactions between biogenic and anthropogenic emissions to form secondary pollutants. During SENEX, the NOAA WP-3D aircraft conducted 20 research flights between 27 May and 10 July 2013 based out of Smyrna, TN. Here we describe the experimental approach, the science goals and early results of the NOAA SENEX campaign. The aircraft, its capabilities and standard measurements are described. The instrument payload is summarized including detection limits, accuracy, precision and time resolutions for all gas-and-aerosol phase instruments. The inter-comparisons of compounds measured with multiple instruments on the NOAA WP-3D are presented and were all within the stated uncertainties, except two of the three NO2 measurements. The SENEX flights included day- and nighttime flights in the Southeast as well as flights over areas with intense shale gas extraction (Marcellus, Fayetteville and Haynesville shale). We present one example flight on 16 June 2013, which was a daytime flight over the Atlanta region, where several crosswind transects of plumes from the city and nearby point sources, such as power plants, paper mills and landfills, were flown. The area around Atlanta has large biogenic isoprene emissions, which provided an excellent case for studying the interactions between biogenic and anthropogenic emissions. In this example flight, chemistry in and outside the Atlanta plumes was observed for several hours after emission. The analysis of this flight showcases the strategies implemented to answer some of the main SENEX science questions.