Search Results
Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally
2013, Kuemmerle, Tobias, Erb, Karlheinz, Meyfroidt, Patrick, Müller, Daniel, Verburg, Peter H., Estel, Stephan, Haberl, Helmut, Hostert, Patrick, Jepsen, Martin R., Kastner, Thomas, Levers, Christian, Lindner, Marcus, Plutzar, Christoph, Verkerk, Pieter Johannes, van der Zanden, Emma H., Reenberg, Anette
Future increases in land-based production will need to focus more on sustainably intensifying existing production systems. Unfortunately, our understanding of the global patterns of land use intensity is weak, partly because land use intensity is a complex, multidimensional term, and partly because we lack appropriate datasets to assess land use intensity across broad geographic extents. Here, we review the state of the art regarding approaches for mapping land use intensity and provide a comprehensive overview of available global-scale datasets on land use intensity. We also outline major challenges and opportunities for mapping land use intensity for cropland, grazing, and forestry systems, and identify key issues for future research.
A framework for modeling adaptive forest management and decision making under climate change
2017, Yousefpour, Rasoul, Temperli, Christian, Bredahl Jacobsen, Jette, Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, Meilby, Henrik, Lexer, Manfred J., Lindner, Marcus, Bugmann, Harald, Borges, Jose G., Palma, João H.N., Ray, Duncan, Zimmermann, Niklaus E., Delzon, Sylvain, Kremer, Antoine, Kramer, Koen, Reyer, Christopher P.O., Lasch-Born, Petra, Garcia-Gonzalo, Jordi, Hanewinkel, Marc
Adapting the management of forest resources to climate change involves addressing several crucial aspects to provide a valid basis for decision making. These include the knowledge and belief of decision makers, the mapping of management options for the current as well as anticipated future bioclimatic and socioeconomic conditions, and the ways decisions are evaluated and made. We investigate the adaptive management process and develop a framework including these three aspects, thus providing a structured way to analyze the challenges and opportunities of managing forests in the face of climate change. We apply the framework for a range of case studies that differ in the way climate and its impacts are projected to change, the available management options, and how decision makers develop, update, and use their beliefs about climate change scenarios to select among adaptation options, each being optimal for a certain climate change scenario. We describe four stylized types of decision-making processes that differ in how they (1) take into account uncertainty and new information on the state and development of the climate and (2) evaluate alternative management decisions: the “no-change,” the “reactive,” the “trend-adaptive,” and the “forward-looking adaptive” decision-making types. Accordingly, we evaluate the experiences with alternative management strategies and recent publications on using Bayesian optimization methods that account for different simulated learning schemes based on varying knowledge, belief, and information. Finally, our proposed framework for identifying adaptation strategies provides solutions for enhancing forest structure and diversity, biomass and timber production, and reducing climate change-induced damages. They are spatially heterogeneous, reflecting the diversity in growing conditions and socioeconomic settings within Europe.
A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity
2013, Erb, Karl-Heinz, Haberl, Helmut, Jepsen, Martin Rudbeck, Kuemmerle, Tobias, Lindner, Marcus, Müller, Daniel, Verburg, Peter H., Reenberg, Anette
Large knowledge gaps currently exist that limit our ability to understand and characterise dynamics and patterns of land-use intensity: in particular, a comprehensive conceptual framework and a system of measurement are lacking. This situation hampers the development of a sound understanding of the mechanisms, determinants, and constraints underlying changes in land-use intensity. On the basis of a review of approaches for studying land-use intensity, we propose a conceptual framework to quantify and analyse land-use intensity. This framework integrates three dimensions: (a) input intensity, (b) output intensity, and (c) the associated system-level impacts of land- based production (e.g. changes in carbon storage or biodiversity). The systematic development of indicators across these dimensions would provide opportunities for the systematic analyses of the trade-offs, synergies and opportunity costs of land-use intensification strategies.
Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?
2017, Reyer, Christopher P.O., Bathgate, Stephen, Blennow, Kristina, Borges, Jose G., Bugmann, Harald, Delzon, Sylvain, Faias, Sonia P., Garcia-Gonzalo, Jordi, Gardiner, Barry, Gonzalez-Olabarria, Jose Ramon, Gracia, Carlos, Hernández, Juan Guerra, Kellomäki, Seppo, Kramer, Koen, Lexer, Manfred J., Lindner, Marcus, van der Maaten, Ernst, Maroschek, Michael, Muys, Bart, Nicoll, Bruce, Palahi, Marc, Palma, João HN, Paulo, Joana A., Peltola, Heli, Pukkala, Timo, Rammer, Werner, Ray, Duncan, Sabaté, Santiago, Schelhaas, Mart-Jan, Seidl, Rupert, Temperli, Christian, Tomé, Margarida, Yousefpour, Rasoul, Zimmermann, Niklaus E., Hanewinkel, Marc
Recent studies projecting future climate change impacts on forests mainly consider either the effects of climate change on productivity or on disturbances. However, productivity and disturbances are intrinsically linked because 1) disturbances directly affect forest productivity (e.g. via a reduction in leaf area, growing stock or resource-use efficiency), and 2) disturbance susceptibility is often coupled to a certain development phase of the forest with productivity determining the time a forest is in this specific phase of susceptibility. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of forest productivity changes in different forest regions in Europe under climate change, and partition these changes into effects induced by climate change alone and by climate change and disturbances. We present projections of climate change impacts on forest productivity from state-of-the-art forest models that dynamically simulate forest productivity and the effects of the main European disturbance agents (fire, storm, insects), driven by the same climate scenario in seven forest case studies along a large climatic gradient throughout Europe. Our study shows that, in most cases, including disturbances in the simulations exaggerate ongoing productivity declines or cancel out productivity gains in response to climate change. In fewer cases, disturbances also increase productivity or buffer climate-change induced productivity losses, e.g. because low severity fires can alleviate resource competition and increase fertilization. Even though our results cannot simply be extrapolated to other types of forests and disturbances, we argue that it is necessary to interpret climate change-induced productivity and disturbance changes jointly to capture the full range of climate change impacts on forests and to plan adaptation measures.
Description and evaluation of the process-based forest model 4C v2.2 at four European forest sites
2020, Lasch-Born, Petra, Suckow, Felicitas, Reyer, Christopher P. O., Gutsch, Martin, Kollas, Chris, Badeck, Franz-Werner, Bugmann, Harald K. M., Grote, Rüdiger, Fürstenau, Cornelia, Lindner, Marcus, Schaber, Jörg
The process-based model 4C (FORESEE) has been developed over the past 20 years to study climate impacts on forests and is now freely available as an open-source tool. The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive description of this 4C version (v2.2) for scientific users of the model and to present an evaluation of 4C at four different forest sites across Europe. The evaluation focuses on forest growth as well as carbon (net ecosystem exchange, gross primary production), water (actual evapotranspiration, soil water content), and heat fluxes (soil temperature) using data from the PROFOUND database. We applied different evaluation metrics and compared the daily, monthly, and annual variability of observed and simulated values. The ability to reproduce forest growth (stem diameter and biomass) differs from site to site and is best for a pine stand in Germany (Peitz, model efficiency ME=0.98). 4C is able to reproduce soil temperature at different depths in Sorø and Hyytiälä with good accuracy (for all soil depths ME > 0.8). The dynamics in simulating carbon and water fluxes are well captured on daily and monthly timescales (0.51 < ME < 0.983) but less so on an annual timescale (ME < 0). This model–data mismatch is possibly due to the accumulation of errors because of processes that are missing or represented in a very general way in 4C but not with enough specific detail to cover strong, site-specific dependencies such as ground vegetation growth. These processes need to be further elaborated to improve the projections of climate change on forests. We conclude that, despite shortcomings, 4C is widely applicable, reliable, and therefore ready to be released to the scientific community to use and further develop the model.
Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950
2022, Patacca, Marco, Lindner, Marcus, Lucas‐Borja, Manuel Esteban, Cordonnier, Thomas, Fidej, Gal, Gardiner, Barry, Hauf, Ylva, Jasinevičius, Gediminas, Labonne, Sophie, Linkevičius, Edgaras, Mahnken, Mats, Milanovic, Slobodan, Nabuurs, Gert‐Jan, Nagel, Thomas A., Nikinmaa, Laura, Panyatov, Momchil, Bercak, Roman, Seidl, Rupert, Ostrogović Sever, Masa Zorana, Socha, Jaroslaw, Thom, Dominik, Vuletic, Dijana, Zudin, Sergey, Schelhaas, Mart‐Jan
Over the last decades, the natural disturbance is increasingly putting pressure on European forests. Shifts in disturbance regimes may compromise forest functioning and the continuous provisioning of ecosystem services to society, including their climate change mitigation potential. Although forests are central to many European policies, we lack the long-term empirical data needed for thoroughly understanding disturbance dynamics, modeling them, and developing adaptive management strategies. Here, we present a unique database of >170,000 records of ground-based natural disturbance observations in European forests from 1950 to 2019. Reported data confirm a significant increase in forest disturbance in 34 European countries, causing on an average of 43.8 million m3 of disturbed timber volume per year over the 70-year study period. This value is likely a conservative estimate due to under-reporting, especially of small-scale disturbances. We used machine learning techniques for assessing the magnitude of unreported disturbances, which are estimated to be between 8.6 and 18.3 million m3/year. In the last 20 years, disturbances on average accounted for 16% of the mean annual harvest in Europe. Wind was the most important disturbance agent over the study period (46% of total damage), followed by fire (24%) and bark beetles (17%). Bark beetle disturbance doubled its share of the total damage in the last 20 years. Forest disturbances can profoundly impact ecosystem services (e.g., climate change mitigation), affect regional forest resource provisioning and consequently disrupt long-term management planning objectives and timber markets. We conclude that adaptation to changing disturbance regimes must be placed at the core of the European forest management and policy debate. Furthermore, a coherent and homogeneous monitoring system of natural disturbances is urgently needed in Europe, to better observe and respond to the ongoing changes in forest disturbance regimes.