Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    The limits to global-warming mitigation by terrestrial carbon removal
    (Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2017) Boysen, Lena R.; Lucht, Wolfgang; Gerten, Dieter; Heck, Vera; Lenton, Timothy M.; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim
    Massive nearā€term greenhouse gas emissions reduction is a precondition for staying ā€œwell below 2Ā°Cā€ global warming as envisaged by the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, extensive terrestrial carbon dioxide removal (tCDR) through managed biomass growth and subsequent carbon capture and storage is required to avoid temperature ā€œovershootā€ in most pertinent scenarios. Here, we address two major issues: First, we calculate the extent of tCDR required to ā€œrepairā€ delayed or insufficient emissions reduction policies unable to prevent global mean temperature rise of 2.5Ā°C or even 4.5Ā°C above preā€industrial level. Our results show that those tCDR measures are unable to counteract ā€œbusinessā€asā€usualā€ emissions without eliminating virtually all natural ecosystems. Even if considerable (Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 [RCP4.5]) emissions reductions are assumed, tCDR with 50% storage efficiency requires >1.1ā€‰Gha of the most productive agricultural areas or the elimination of >50% of natural forests. In addition, >100ā€‰MtN/yr fertilizers would be needed to remove the roughly 320ā€‰GtC foreseen in these scenarios. Such interventions would severely compromise food production and/or biosphere functioning. Second, we reanalyze the requirements for achieving the 160ā€“190ā€‰GtC tCDR that would complement strong mitigation action (RCP2.6) in order to avoid 2Ā°C overshoot anytime. We find that a combination of high irrigation water input and/or more efficient conversion to stored carbon is necessary. In the face of severe tradeā€offs with society and the biosphere, we conclude that largeā€scale tCDR is not a viable alternative to aggressive emissions reduction. However, we argue that tCDR might serve as a valuable ā€œsupporting actorā€ for strong mitigation if sustainable schemes are established immediately.
  • Item
    The worldā€™s biggest gamble
    (Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2016) Rockstrƶm, Johan; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Hoskins, Brian; Ramanathan, Veerabhadran; Schlosser, Peter; Brasseur, Guy Pierre; Gaffney, Owen; Nobre, Carlos; Meinshausen, Malte; Rogelj, Joeri; Lucht, Wolfgang
    The scale of the decarbonisation challenge to meet the Paris Agreement is underplayed in the public arena. It will require precipitous emissions reductions within 40 years and a new carbon sink on the scale of the ocean sink. Even then, the world is extremely likely to overshoot. A catastrophic failure of policy, for example, waiting another decade for transformative policy and full commitments to fossilā€free economies, will have irreversible and deleterious repercussions for humanity's remaining time on Earth. Only a global zero carbon roadmap will put the world on a course to phaseā€out greenhouse gas emissions and create the essential carbon sinks for Earthā€system stability, without which, world prosperity is not possible.