9 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
- ItemTowards OSGeo best practices for scientific software citation: Integration options for persistent identifiers in OSGeo project repositories(Genf : Zenodo, 2017) Löwe, Peter Heinz; Neteler, Markus; Goebel, Jan; Tullney, MarcoAs a contribution to the currently ongoing larger effort to establish Open Science as best practices in academia, this article focuses on the Open Source and Open Access tiers of the Open Science triad and community software projects. The current situation of research software development and the need to recognize it as a significant contribution to science is introduced in relation to Open Science. The adoption of the Open Science paradigms occurs at different speeds and on different levels within the various fields of science and crosscutting software communities. This is paralleled by the emerging of an underlying futuresafe technical infrastructure based on open standards to enable proper recognition for published articles, data, and software. Currently the number of journal publications about research software remains low in comparison to the amount of research code published on various software repositories in the WWW. Because common standards for the citation of software projects (containers) and versions of software are lacking, the FORCE11 group and the CodeMeta project recommending to establish Persistent Identifiers (PIDs), together with suitable metadata setss to reliably cite research software. This approach is compared to the best practices implemented by the OSGeo Foundation for geospatial community software projects. For GRASS GIS, a OSGeo project and one of the oldest geospatial open source community projects, the external requirements for DOI-based software citation are compared with the projects software documentation standards. Based on this status assessment, application scenarios are derived, how OSGeo projects can approach DOI-based software citation, both as a standalone option and also as a means to foster open access journal publications as part of reproducible Open Science.
- ItemPublikationen und Gender-Effekte in der Mathematik(Zenodo, 2018) Mihaljević, Helena; Santamaría, Lucía; Tullney, MarcoDie Unterrepräsentation von Frauen in der wissenschaftlichen Mathematik hält trotz steigender Absolventinnenzahlen an. Publikationen sind ein wesentlicher Baustein wissenschaftlicher Karrieren. Deshalb werden sie in unserer Arbeit analysiert. Es werden zentraler Ergebnisse eines Forschungsartikels (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165367) vorgestellt, weitere Forschung angekündigt und schließlich zu einer Diskussion eingeladen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen deutliche Unterschiede beim Publikationsverhalten zwischen Frauen und Männern mit Karrierenachteilen für Frauen. Die Geschlechterzuschreibung erfolgte algorithmisch auf Basis von Einträgen in zbMATH.
- ItemOpen-Access-Monitoring zwischen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit(Zenodo, 2017) Tullney, MarcoOpen-Access-Monitoring ist ein vage definiertes, aber immer wichtiger werdendes Tätigkeitsfeld im Open-Access-Kontext. Es korrespondiert mit Open-Access-Strategien und -Vorgaben und dient sowohl der Planung von Open-Access-Aktivitäten als auch der Messung von deren Erfolg. Unter Zeitdruck werden Open-Access-Kriterien nicht immer sauber ausdefiniert, und pragmatische und interessengeleitete Abkürzungen tauchen auf. Im Zuge der Open-Access-Transformation wird es mehr denn je wichtig sein, transparente und vergleichbare Messungen von Open Access vornehmen zu können. Transparenz im Hinblick auf verwandte Definitionen, Daten und Instrumente ist dabei ebenso wichtig wie der Zugriff auf standardisierbare und stabile Informationen zum Publikationsoutput.
- Item3b Open-Access-Publikationsfonds(Zenodo, 2017) Pampel, Heinz; Tullney, MarcoEin Open-Access-Publikationsfonds ist ein Finanzierungs- und Steuerungsinstrument wissenschaftlicher Einrichtungen zur Übernahme von Open-Access-Publikationsgebühren. Dieser Beitrag befasst sich mit Aufbau und Betrieb eines solchen Fonds.
- ItemOverview: Routes to Open Access(Zenodo, 2017) Tullney, Marco; van Wezenbeek, WilmaSlides of an overview presentation given at a CESAER workshop on Open Access, February 2nd, 2017, in Brussels Cover major routes to more open access as discussed in the Task Force Open Science of CESAER: (national) open access strategies, open access mandates, open access incentives, open access awareness, open access publishing, open access infrastructure
- ItemTowards an Open Research Knowledge Graph(Zenodo, 2018) Auer, Sören; Blümel, Ina; Ewerth, Ralph; Garatzogianni, Alexandra; Heller,, Lambert; Hoppe, Anett; Kasprzik, Anna; Koepler, Oliver; Nejdl, Wolfgang; Plank, Margret; Sens, Irina; Stocker, Markus; Tullney, Marco; Vidal, Maria-Esther; van Wezenbeek, WilmaThe document-oriented workflows in science have reached (or already exceeded) the limits of adequacy as highlighted for example by recent discussions on the increasing proliferation of scientific literature and the reproducibility crisis. Despite an improved and digital access to scientific publications in the last decades, the exchange of scholarly knowledge continues to be primarily document-based: Researchers produce essays and articles that are made available in online and offline publication media as roughly granular text documents. With current developments in areas such as knowledge representation, semantic search, human-machine interaction, natural language processing, and artificial intelligence, it is possible to completely rethink this dominant paradigm of document-centered knowledge exchange and transform it into knowledge-based information flows by representing and expressing knowledge through semantically rich, interlinked knowledge graphs. The core of the establishment of knowledge-based information flows is the distributed, decentralized, collaborative creation and evolution of information models, vocabularies, ontologies, and knowledge graphs for the establishment of a common understanding of data and information between the various stakeholders as well as the integration of these technologies into the infrastructure and processes of search and knowledge exchange in the research library of the future. By integrating these information models into existing and new research infrastructure services, the information structures that are currently still implicit and deeply hidden in documents can be made explicit and directly usable. This revolutionizes scientific work because information and research results can be seamlessly interlinked with each other and better mapped to complex information needs. As a result, scientific work becomes more effective and efficient, since results become directly comparable and easier to reuse. In order to realize the vision of knowledge-based information flows in scholarly communication, comprehensive long-term technological infrastructure development and accompanying research are required. To secure information sovereignty, it is also of paramount importance to science – and urgency to science policymakers – that scientific infrastructures establish an open counterweight to emerging commercial developments in this area. The aim of this position paper is to facilitate the discussion on requirements, design decisions and a minimum viable product for an Open Research Knowledge Graph infrastructure. TIB aims to start developing this infrastructure in an open collaboration with interested partner organizations and individuals.
- ItemWege zum Goldenen Weg: Modelle der Open-Access-Transformation für Zeitschriften(Zenodo, 2017) Riesenweber, Christina; Tullney, MarcoFolien zum Vortrag "Wege zum Goldenen Weg: Modelle der Open-Access-Transformation für Zeitschriften" in Veranstaltung: Erfolgreiches Journal-Management: Transformation und Open Science Workshop in der Leibniz-Geschäftsstelle Berlin am 19./20.01.2017
- ItemFreie Versionen paywall-geschützter Artikel finden(Zenodo, 2017) Tullney, MarcoPräsentation zum Hobsy-Workshop 2017, 15. Dezember 2017, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek
- ItemInformationsbeschaffungs- und Publikationsverhalten von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern der natur- und ingenieurwissenschaftlichen Fächern : Auswertung einer Umfrage mit Schwerpunkt auf nicht-textuellen Materialien(Hannover : Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB), 2017) Einbock, Joanna; Dreyer, Britta; Heller, Lambert; Kraft, Angelina; Niemeyer, Sandra; Plank, Margret; Schrenk, Philip; Sens, Irina; Struß, Julia; Tullney, Marco; Bernhofer, Carolin; Häfner, Peter[no abstract available]