Search Results
Management-induced changes in soil organic carbon on global croplands
2022, Karstens, Kristine, Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon, Dietrich, Jan Philipp, Dondini, Marta, Heinke, Jens, Kuhnert, Matthias, Müller, Christoph, Rolinski, Susanne, Smith, Pete, Weindl, Isabelle, Lotze-Campen, Hermann, Popp, Alexander
Soil organic carbon (SOC), one of the largest terrestrial carbon (C) stocks on Earth, has been depleted by anthropogenic land cover change and agricultural management. However, the latter has so far not been well represented in global C stock assessments. While SOC models often simulate detailed biochemical processes that lead to the accumulation and decay of SOC, the management decisions driving these biophysical processes are still little investigated at the global scale. Here we develop a spatially explicit data set for agricultural management on cropland, considering crop production levels, residue returning rates, manure application, and the adoption of irrigation and tillage practices. We combine it with a reduced-complexity model based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) tier 2 method to create a half-degree resolution data set of SOC stocks and SOC stock changes for the first 30 cm of mineral soils. We estimate that, due to arable farming, soils have lost around 34.6 GtC relative to a counterfactual hypothetical natural state in 1975. Within the period 1975-2010, this SOC debt continued to expand by 5 GtC (0.14 GtCyr-1) to around 39.6 GtC. However, accounting for historical management led to 2.1 GtC fewer (0.06 GtCyr-1) emissions than under the assumption of constant management. We also find that management decisions have influenced the historical SOC trajectory most strongly by residue returning, indicating that SOC enhancement by biomass retention may be a promising negative emissions technique. The reduced-complexity SOC model may allow us to simulate management-induced SOC enhancement - also within computationally demanding integrated (land use) assessment modeling.
Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950
2022, Patacca, Marco, Lindner, Marcus, Lucas‐Borja, Manuel Esteban, Cordonnier, Thomas, Fidej, Gal, Gardiner, Barry, Hauf, Ylva, Jasinevičius, Gediminas, Labonne, Sophie, Linkevičius, Edgaras, Mahnken, Mats, Milanovic, Slobodan, Nabuurs, Gert‐Jan, Nagel, Thomas A., Nikinmaa, Laura, Panyatov, Momchil, Bercak, Roman, Seidl, Rupert, Ostrogović Sever, Masa Zorana, Socha, Jaroslaw, Thom, Dominik, Vuletic, Dijana, Zudin, Sergey, Schelhaas, Mart‐Jan
Over the last decades, the natural disturbance is increasingly putting pressure on European forests. Shifts in disturbance regimes may compromise forest functioning and the continuous provisioning of ecosystem services to society, including their climate change mitigation potential. Although forests are central to many European policies, we lack the long-term empirical data needed for thoroughly understanding disturbance dynamics, modeling them, and developing adaptive management strategies. Here, we present a unique database of >170,000 records of ground-based natural disturbance observations in European forests from 1950 to 2019. Reported data confirm a significant increase in forest disturbance in 34 European countries, causing on an average of 43.8 million m3 of disturbed timber volume per year over the 70-year study period. This value is likely a conservative estimate due to under-reporting, especially of small-scale disturbances. We used machine learning techniques for assessing the magnitude of unreported disturbances, which are estimated to be between 8.6 and 18.3 million m3/year. In the last 20 years, disturbances on average accounted for 16% of the mean annual harvest in Europe. Wind was the most important disturbance agent over the study period (46% of total damage), followed by fire (24%) and bark beetles (17%). Bark beetle disturbance doubled its share of the total damage in the last 20 years. Forest disturbances can profoundly impact ecosystem services (e.g., climate change mitigation), affect regional forest resource provisioning and consequently disrupt long-term management planning objectives and timber markets. We conclude that adaptation to changing disturbance regimes must be placed at the core of the European forest management and policy debate. Furthermore, a coherent and homogeneous monitoring system of natural disturbances is urgently needed in Europe, to better observe and respond to the ongoing changes in forest disturbance regimes.
EEG biomarkers of activation of the lymphatic drainage system of the brain during sleep and opening of the blood-brain barrier
2022, Semyachkina-Glushkovskaya, O.V., Karavaev, A.S., Prokhorov, M.D., Runnova, A.E., Borovkova, E.I., Ishbulatov, Yu.M., Hramkov, A.N., Kulminskiy, D.D., Semenova, N.I., Sergeev, K.S., Slepnev, A.V., Sitnikova, E.Yu., Zhuravlev, M.O., Fedosov, I.V., Shirokov, A.A., Blokhina, I.A., Dubrovski, A.I., Terskov, A.V., Khorovodov, A.P., Ageev, V.B., Elovenko, D.A., Evsukova, A.S., Adushkina, V.V., Telnova, V.V., Postnov, D.E., Penzel, T.U., Kurths, J.G.
The lymphatic drainage system of the brain (LDSB) is the removal of metabolites and wastes from its tissues. A dysfunction of LDSB is an important sign of aging, brain oncology, the Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. The development of new strategies for diagnosis of LDSB injuries can improve prevention of age-related cerebral amyloid angiopathy, neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseases. There are two conditions, such as deep sleep and opening of the blood-brain-barrier (OBBB) associated with the LDSB activation. A promising candidate for measurement of LDSB could be electroencephalography (EEG). In this pilot study on rats, we tested the hypothesis, whether deep sleep and OBBB can be an informative platform for an effective extracting of information about the LDSB functions. Using the nonlinear analysis of EEG dynamics and machine learning technology, we discovered that the LDSB activation during OBBB and sleep is associated with similar changes in the EEG θ-activity. The OBBB causes the higher LDSB activation vs. sleep that is accompanied by specific changes in the low frequency EEG activity extracted by the power spectra analysis of the EEG dynamics combined with the coherence function. Thus, our findings demonstrate a link between neural activity associated with the LDSB activation during sleep and OBBB that is an important informative platform for extraction of the EEG-biomarkers of the LDSB activity. These results open new perspectives for the development of technology for the LDSB diagnostics that would open a novel era in the prognosis of brain diseases caused by the LDSB disorders, including OBBB.
Responsibility Under Uncertainty: Which Climate Decisions Matter Most?
2023, Botta, Nicola, Brede, Nuria, Crucifix, Michel, Ionescu, Cezar, Jansson, Patrik, Li, Zheng, Martínez, Marina, Richter, Tim
We propose a new method for estimating how much decisions under monadic uncertainty matter. The method is generic and suitable for measuring responsibility in finite horizon sequential decision processes. It fulfills “fairness” requirements and three natural conditions for responsibility measures: agency, avoidance and causal relevance. We apply the method to study how much decisions matter in a stylized greenhouse gas emissions process in which a decision maker repeatedly faces two options: start a “green” transition to a decarbonized society or further delay such a transition. We account for the fact that climate decisions are rarely implemented with certainty and that their consequences on the climate and on the global economy are uncertain. We discover that a “moral” approach towards decision making — doing the right thing even though the probability of success becomes increasingly small — is rational over a wide range of uncertainties.
Quantifying sustainable intensification of agriculture: The contribution of metrics and modelling
2021, Mouratiadou, Ioanna, Latka, Catharina, van der Hilst, Floor, Müller, Christoph, Berges, Regine, Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon, Ewert, Frank, Faye, Babacar, Heckelei, Thomas, Hoffmann, Munir, Lehtonen, Heikki, Lorite, Ignacio Jesus, Nendel, Claas, Palosuo, Taru, Rodríguez, Alfredo, Rötter, Reimund Paul, Ruiz-Ramos, Margarita, Stella, Tommaso, Webber, Heidi, Wicke, Birka
Sustainable intensification (SI) of agriculture is a promising strategy for boosting the capacity of the agricultural sector to meet the growing demands for food and non-food products and services in a sustainable manner. Assessing and quantifying the options for SI remains a challenge due to its multiple dimensions and potential associated trade-offs. We contribute to overcoming this challenge by proposing an approach for the ex-ante evaluation of SI options and trade-offs to facilitate decision making in relation to SI. This approach is based on the utilization of a newly developed SI metrics framework (SIMeF) combined with agricultural systems modelling. We present SIMeF and its operationalization approach with modelling and evaluate the approach’s feasibility by assessing to what extent the SIMeF metrics can be quantified by representative agricultural systems models. SIMeF is based on the integration of academic and policy indicator frameworks, expert opinions, as well as the Sustainable Development Goals. Structured along seven SI domains and consisting of 37 themes, 142 sub-themes and 1128 metrics, it offers a holistic, generic, and policy-relevant dashboard for selecting the SI metrics to be quantified for the assessment of SI options in diverse contexts. The use of SIMeF with agricultural systems modelling allows the ex-ante assessment of SI options with respect to their productivity, resource use efficiency, environmental sustainability and, to a large extent, economic sustainability. However, we identify limitations to the use of modelling to represent several SI aspects related to social sustainability, certain ecological functions, the multi-functionality of agriculture, the management of losses and waste, and security and resilience. We suggest advancements in agricultural systems models and greater interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary integration to improve the ability to quantify SI metrics and to assess trade-offs across the various dimensions of SI.