6 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
- ItemErster TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshop - DataCite Metadaten Schema 4.4(Hannover : Technische Informationsbibliothek, PID Competence Center, 2021-05-03) Taller, Nelli; Burger, Felix; Dreyer, BrittaFolien für den virtuellen Workshop "Erster TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshop - DataCite Metadaten Schema 4.4".
- ItemFrühlings TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshop - Best Practices Empfehlungen zum DOI-Metadatenfeld relatedIdentifier(Hannover : Technische Informationsbibliothek, PID Competence Center, 2022-05-12) Taller, Nelli; Burger, FelixFolien für den virtuellen Workshop "Frühlings TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshop - Best Practices Empfehlungen zum DOI-Metadatenfeld relatedIdentifier".
- ItemDiscussion on Existing Standards and Quality Criteria in Nanosafety Research : Summary of the NanoS-QM Expert Workshop(Zenodo, 2021) Binder, Kunigunde; Bonatto Minella, Christian; Elberskirchen, Linda; Kraegeloh, Annette; Liebing, Julia; Petzold, Christiane; Razum, Matthias; Riefler, Norbert; Schins, Roel; Sofranko, Adriana; van Thriel, Christoph; Unfried, KlausThe partners of the research project NanoS-QM (Quality- and Description Standards for Nanosafety Research Data) identified and invited relevant experts from research institutions, federal agencies, and industry to evaluate the traceability of the results generated with the existing standards and quality criteria. During the discussion it emerged that numerous studies seem to be of insufficient quality for regulatory purposes or exhibit weaknesses with regard to data completeness. Deficiencies in study design could be avoided by more comprehensive use of appropriate standards, many of which already exist. The use of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) that allow for early collection of metadata and enrichment of datasets could be one solution to enable data re-use and simplify quality control. Generally, earlier provision and curation of data and metadata indicating their quality and completeness (e.g. guidelines, standards, standard operating procedures (SOPs) that were used) would improve their findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) in the nanosafety research field.
- ItemHerbst TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshops - Metadaten Best Practice(Hannover : Technische Informationsbibliothek, PID Competence Center, 2021-11-09) Taller, Nelli; Dreyer, Britta; Burger, Felix; Hagemann-Wilholt, StephanieFolien für den virtuellen Workshop "Herbst TIB DOI Konsortium online Workshops - Metadaten Best Practice".
- ItemIsn't a number and a URL enough? Why PIDs matter and technical solutions alone are not sufficient(Zenodo, 2023) Schrader, Antonia C.; Hagemann-Wilholt, Stephanie; Czerniak, AndreasIn the presentation, we introduce the two projects PID4NFDI and PID Network Germany that deal with PIDs at the national level, present some initial findings and highlight their benefit for NFDI. PIDs are used and needed along the entire lifecycle of research data: from enabling to connecting. However, a particular focus for the presentation will be laid on harmonising and connecting.
- ItemDigital research data: from analysis of existing standards to a scientific foundation for a modular metadata schema in nanosafety(London : BioMed Central, 2022) Elberskirch, Linda; Binder, Kunigunde; Riefler, Norbert; Sofranko, Adriana; Liebing, Julia; Minella, Christian Bonatto; Mädler, Lutz; Razum, Matthias; van Thriel, Christoph; Unfried, Klaus; Schins, Roel P. F.; Kraegeloh, AnnetteBackground: Assessing the safety of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is an interdisciplinary and complex process producing huge amounts of information and data. To make such data and metadata reusable for researchers, manufacturers, and regulatory authorities, there is an urgent need to record and provide this information in a structured, harmonized, and digitized way. Results: This study aimed to identify appropriate description standards and quality criteria for the special use in nanosafety. There are many existing standards and guidelines designed for collecting data and metadata, ranging from regulatory guidelines to specific databases. Most of them are incomplete or not specifically designed for ENM research. However, by merging the content of several existing standards and guidelines, a basic catalogue of descriptive information and quality criteria was generated. In an iterative process, our interdisciplinary team identified deficits and added missing information into a comprehensive schema. Subsequently, this overview was externally evaluated by a panel of experts during a workshop. This whole process resulted in a minimum information table (MIT), specifying necessary minimum information to be provided along with experimental results on effects of ENMs in the biological context in a flexible and modular manner. The MIT is divided into six modules: general information, material information, biological model information, exposure information, endpoint read out information and analysis and statistics. These modules are further partitioned into module subdivisions serving to include more detailed information. A comparison with existing ontologies, which also aim to electronically collect data and metadata on nanosafety studies, showed that the newly developed MIT exhibits a higher level of detail compared to those existing schemas, making it more usable to prevent gaps in the communication of information. Conclusion: Implementing the requirements of the MIT into e.g., electronic lab notebooks (ELNs) would make the collection of all necessary data and metadata a daily routine and thereby would improve the reproducibility and reusability of experiments. Furthermore, this approach is particularly beneficial regarding the rapidly expanding developments and applications of novel non-animal alternative testing methods.