Search Results
WFDE5: Bias-adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies
2020, Cucchi, Marco, Weedon, Graham P., Amici, Alessandro, Bellouin, Nicolas, Lange, Stefan, Müller Schmied, Hannes, Hersbach, Hans, Buontempo, Carlo
The WFDE5 dataset has been generated using the WATCH Forcing Data (WFD) methodology applied to surface meteorological variables from the ERA5 reanalysis. The WFDEI dataset had previously been generated by applying the WFD methodology to ERA-Interim. The WFDE5 is provided at 0.5 spatial resolution but has higher temporal resolution (hourly) compared to WFDEI (3-hourly). It also has higher spatial variability since it was generated by aggregation of the higher-resolution ERA5 rather than by interpolation of the lower-resolution ERA-Interim data. Evaluation against meteorological observations at 13 globally distributed FLUXNET2015 sites shows that, on average, WFDE5 has lower mean absolute error and higher correlation than WFDEI for all variables. Bias-adjusted monthly precipitation totals of WFDE5 result in more plausible global hydrological water balance components when analysed in an uncalibrated hydrological model (WaterGAP) than with the use of raw ERA5 data for model forcing. The dataset, which can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.20d54e34 (C3S, 2020b), is distributed by the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) through its Climate Data Store (CDS, C3S, 2020a) and currently spans from the start of January 1979 to the end of 2018. The dataset has been produced using a number of CDS Toolbox applications, whose source code is available with the data - allowing users to regenerate part of the dataset or apply the same approach to other data. Future updates are expected spanning from 1950 to the most recent year. A sample of the complete dataset, which covers the whole of the year 2016, is accessible without registration to the CDS at https://doi.org/10.21957/935p-cj60 (Cucchi et al., 2020). © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
SISALv2: A comprehensive speleothem isotope database with multiple age-depth models
2020, Comas-Bru, Laia, Rehfeld, Kira, Roesch, Carla, Amirnezhad-Mozhdehi, Sahar, Harrison, Sandy P., Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat, Ahmad, Syed Masood, Brahim, Yassine Ait, Baker, Andy, Bosomworth, Matthew, Breitenbach, Sebastian F.M., Burstyn, Yuval, Columbu, Andrea, Deininger, Michael, Demény, Attila, Dixon, Bronwyn, Fohlmeister, Jens, Hatvani, István Gábor, Hu, Jun, Kaushal, Nikita, Kern, Zoltán, Labuhn, Inga, Lechleitner, Franziska A., Lorrey, Andrew, Martrat, Belen, Felipe Novello, Valdir, Oster, Jessica, Pérez-Mejías, Carlos, Scholz, Denis, Scroxton, Nick, Sinha, Nitesh, Ward, Brittany Marie, Warken, Sophie, Zhang, Haiwei, SISAL Working Group members
Characterizing the temporal uncertainty in palaeoclimate records is crucial for analysing past climate change, correlating climate events between records, assessing climate periodicities, identifying potential triggers and evaluating climate model simulations. The first global compilation of speleothem isotope records by the SISAL (Speleothem Isotope Synthesis and Analysis) working group showed that age model uncertainties are not systematically reported in the published literature, and these are only available for a limited number of records (ca. 15 %, n = 107=691). To improve the usefulness of the SISAL database, we have (i) improved the database's spatiooral coverage and (ii) created new chronologies using seven different approaches for age depth modelling. We have applied these alternative chronologies to the records from the first version of the SISAL database (SISALv1) and to new records compiled since the release of SISALv1. This paper documents the necessary changes in the structure of the SISAL database to accommodate the inclusion of the new age models and their uncertainties as well as the expansion of the database to include new records and the qualitycontrol measures applied. This paper also documents the age depth model approaches used to calculate the new chronologies. The updated version of the SISAL database (SISALv2) contains isotopic data from 691 speleothem records from 294 cave sites and new age depth models, including age depth temporal uncertainties for 512 speleothems. SISALv2 is available at https://doi.org/10.17864/1947.256 (Comas-Bru et al., 2020a). © 2020 Author(s).
Mapping the yields of lignocellulosic bioenergy crops from observations at the global scale
2020, Li, Wei, Ciais, Philippe, Stehfest, Elke, van Vuuren, Detlef, Popp, Alexander, Arneth, Almut, Di Fulvio, Fulvio, Doelma, Jonathan, Humpenöder, Florian, Harper, Anna B., Park, Taejin, Makowski, David, Havlik, Petr, Obersteiner, Michael, Wang, Jingmeng, Krause, Andreas, Liu, Wenfeng
Most scenarios from integrated assessment models (IAMs) that project greenhouse gas emissions include the use of bioenergy as a means to reduce CO2 emissions or even to achieve negative emissions (together with CCS carbon capture and storage). The potential amount of CO2 that can be removed from the atmosphere depends, among others, on the yields of bioenergy crops, the land available to grow these crops and the efficiency with which CO2 produced by combustion is captured. While bioenergy crop yields can be simulated by models, estimates of the spatial distribution of bioenergy yields under current technology based on a large number of observations are currently lacking. In this study, a random-forest (RF) algorithm is used to upscale a bioenergy yield dataset of 3963 observations covering Miscanthus, switchgrass, eucalypt, poplar and willow using climatic and soil conditions as explanatory variables. The results are global yield maps of five important lignocellulosic bioenergy crops under current technology, climate and atmospheric CO2 conditions at a 0:5 0:5 spatial resolution. We also provide a combined "best bioenergy crop" yield map by selecting one of the five crop types with the highest yield in each of the grid cells, eucalypt and Miscanthus in most cases. The global median yield of the best crop is 16.3 tDMha1 yr1 (DM dry matter). High yields mainly occur in the Amazon region and southeastern Asia. We further compare our empirically derived maps with yield maps used in three IAMs and find that the median yields in our maps are 50% higher than those in the IAM maps. Our estimates of gridded bioenergy crop yields can be used to provide bioenergy yields for IAMs, to evaluate land surface models or to identify the most suitable lands for future bioenergy crop plantations. The 0:5 0:5 global maps for yields of different bioenergy crops and the best crop and for the best crop composition generated from this study can be download from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3274254 (Li, 2019). © 2019 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
Generating a rule-based global gridded tillage dataset
2020, Porwollik, Vera, Rolinski, Susanne, Heinke, Jens, Müller, Christoph
Tillage is a central element in agricultural soil management and has direct and indirect effects on processes in the biosphere. Effects of agricultural soil management can be assessed by soil, crop, and ecosystem models, but global assessments are hampered by lack of information on the type of tillage and their spatial distribution. This study describes the generation of a classification of tillage practices and presents the spatially explicit mapping of these crop-specific tillage systems for around the year 2005. Tillage practices differ by the kind of equipment used, soil surface and depth affected, timing, and their purpose within the cropping systems. We classified the broad variety of globally relevant tillage practices into six categories: no-tillage in the context of Conservation Agriculture, traditional annual, traditional rotational, rotational, reduced, and conventional annual tillage. The identified tillage systems were allocated to gridded crop-specific cropland areas with a resolution of 5 arcmin. Allocation rules were based on literature findings and combine area information on crop type, water management regime, field size, water erosion, income, and aridity. We scaled reported national Conservation Agriculture areas down to grid cells via a probability-based approach for 54 countries. We provide area estimates of the six tillage systems aggregated to global and country scale. We found that 8.67Mkm2 of global cropland area was tilled intensively at least once a year, whereas the remaining 2.65Mkm2 was tilled less intensely. Further, we identified 4.67Mkm2 of cropland as an area where Conservation Agriculture could be expanded to under current conditions. The tillage classification enables the parameterization of different soil management practices in various kinds of model simulations. The crop-specific tillage dataset indicates the spatial distribution of soil management practices, which is a prerequisite to assess erosion, carbon sequestration potential, as well as water, and nutrient dynamics of cropland soils. The dynamic definition of the allocation rules and accounting for national statistics, such as the share of Conservation Agriculture per country, also allow for derivation of datasets for historical and future global soil management scenarios. The resulting tillage system dataset and source code are accessible via an open-data repository (DOIs: https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.009 and https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.010, Porwollik et al., 2019a, b). © Author(s) 2019.
The PROFOUND Database for evaluating vegetation models and simulating climate impacts on European forests
2020, Reyer, Christopher P.O., Silveyra Gonzalez, Ramiro, Dolos, Klara, Hartig, Florian, Hauf, Ylva, Noack, Matthias, Lasch-Born, Petra, Rötzer, Thomas, Pretzsch, Hans, Meesenburg, Henning, Fleck, Stefan, Wagner, Markus, Bolte, Andreas, Sanders, Tanja G.M., Kolari, Pasi, Mäkelä, Annikki, Vesala, Timo, Mammarella, Ivan, Pumpanen, Jukka, Collalti, Alessio, Trotta, Carlo, Matteucci, Giorgio, D'Andrea, Ettore, Foltýnová, Lenka, Krejza, Jan, Ibrom, Andreas, Pilegaard, Kim, Loustau, Denis, Bonnefond, Jean-Marc, Berbigier, Paul, Picart, Delphine, Lafont, Sébastien, Dietze, Michael, Cameron, David, Vieno, Massimo, Tian, Hanqin, Palacios-Orueta, Alicia, Cicuendez, Victor, Recuero, Laura, Wiese, Klaus, Büchner, Matthias, Lange, Stefan, Volkholz, Jan, Kim, Hyungjun, Horemans, Joanna A., Bohn, Friedrich, Steinkamp, Jörg, Chikalanov, Alexander, Weedon, Graham P., Sheffield, Justin, Babst, Flurin, Vega del Valle, Iliusi, Suckow, Felicitas, Martel, Simon, Mahnken, Mats, Gutsch, Martin, Frieler, Katja
Process-based vegetation models are widely used to predict local and global ecosystem dynamics and climate change impacts. Due to their complexity, they require careful parameterization and evaluation to ensure that projections are accurate and reliable. The PROFOUND Database (PROFOUND DB) provides a wide range of empirical data on European forests to calibrate and evaluate vegetation models that simulate climate impacts at the forest stand scale. A particular advantage of this database is its wide coverage of multiple data sources at different hierarchical and temporal scales, together with environmental driving data as well as the latest climate scenarios. Specifically, the PROFOUND DB provides general site descriptions, soil, climate, CO2, nitrogen deposition, tree and forest stand level, and remote sensing data for nine contrasting forest stands distributed across Europe. Moreover, for a subset of five sites, time series of carbon fluxes, atmospheric heat conduction and soil water are also available. The climate and nitrogen deposition data contain several datasets for the historic period and a wide range of future climate change scenarios following the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, RCP8.5). We also provide pre-industrial climate simulations that allow for model runs aimed at disentangling the contribution of climate change to observed forest productivity changes. The PROFOUND DB is available freely as a “SQLite” relational database or “ASCII” flat file version (at https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2020.006/; Reyer et al., 2020). The data policies of the individual contributing datasets are provided in the metadata of each data file. The PROFOUND DB can also be accessed via the ProfoundData R package (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ProfoundData; Silveyra Gonzalez et al., 2020), which provides basic functions to explore, plot and extract the data for model set-up, calibration and evaluation.