Filters

2020 - 20212

More filters

2021 - 20222
Reset filters

Settings

Start date: 2016 × Subject: Bioeconomy monitoring ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An extended hybrid input-output model applied to fossil- and bio-based plastics
    (Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2021) Jander, Wiebke
    Matrix augmentation method is developed further and described transparently for enabling more specific input-output analyses of bio- vs. fossil-based sectors. A number of economic and environmental effects of substitution can be estimated, compared, and managed. While the model was applied for the first time to the German plastics industry, it can be well integrated into existing bioeconomy monitorings to represent substitution in sectors and countries. • Original matrix augmentation method is described in much detail for the first time considering available data for bio- and fossil-based industries. • Particular attention is paid to balancing cost and benefit in model building so that indicators can be integrated in a continuous monitoring of the bioeconomy. Hence, industry data is prefered to process data whenever possible. • Input structures of bio-based imports are considered in single-region input-output analysis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Monitoring Bioeconomy Transitions with Economic–Environmental and Innovation Indicators: Addressing Data Gaps in the Short Term
    (Basel : MDPI AG, 2020) Jander, Wiebke; Wydra, Sven; Wackerbauer, Johann; Grundmann, Philipp; Piotrowski, Stephan
    Monitoring bioeconomy transitions and their effects can be considered a Herculean task, as they cannot be easily captured using current economic statistics. Distinctions are rarely made between bio-based and non-bio-based products when official data is collected. However, production along bioeconomy supply chains and its implications for sustainability require measurement and assessment to enable considered policymaking. We propose a starting point for monitoring bioeconomy transitions by suggesting an adapted framework, relevant sectors, and indicators that can be observed with existing information and data from many alternative sources, assuming that official data collection methods will not be modified soon. Economic–environmental indicators and innovation indicators are derived for the German surfactant industry based on the premise that combined economic–environmental indicators can show actual developments and trade-offs, while innovation indicators can reveal whether a bioeconomy transition is likely in a sector. Methodological challenges are discussed and low-cost; high-benefit options for further data collection are recommended.