Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Global and country-level data of the biodiversity footprints of 175 crops and pasture
    (Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2021) Beyer, Robert; Manica, Andrea
    The destruction of natural habitat for cropland and pasture represents a major threat to global biodiversity. Despite widespread societal concern about biodiversity loss associated with food production, consumer access to quantitative estimates of the impact of crop production on the world's species has been very limited compared to assessments of other environmental variables such as greenhouse gas emissions or water use. Here, we present a consistent dataset of the biodiversity footprints of pasture and 175 crops at the global and national level. The data were generated by combining maps of the global distribution of agricultural areas in the year 2000 with spatially explicit estimates of the biodiversity loss associated with the conversion of natural habitat to farmland. Estimates were derived for three common alternative measures of biodiversity - species richness, threatened species richness, and range rarity - of the world's mammals, birds, and amphibians. Our dataset provides important quantitative information for food consumers and policy makers, allowing them to take evidence-based decisions to reduce the biodiversity footprint of global food production.
  • Item
    Process disturbances in agricultural biogas production—causes, mechanisms and effects on the biogas microbiome: A review
    (Basel : MDPI AG, 2019) Theuerl, S.; Klang, J.; Prochnow, A.
    Disturbances of the anaerobic digestion process reduce the economic and environmental performance of biogas systems. A better understanding of the highly complex process is of crucial importance in order to avoid disturbances. This review defines process disturbances as significant changes in the functionality within the microbial community leading to unacceptable and severe decreases in biogas production and requiring an active counteraction to be overcome. The main types of process disturbances in agricultural biogas production are classified as unfavorable process temperatures, fluctuations in the availability of macro- and micronutrients (feedstock variability), overload of the microbial degradation potential, process-related accumulation of inhibiting metabolites such as hydrogen (H 2 ), ammonium/ammonia (NH 4 + /NH 3 ) or hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) and inhibition by other organic and inorganic toxicants. Causes, mechanisms and effects on the biogas microbiome are discussed. The need for a knowledge-based microbiome management to ensure a stable and efficient production of biogas with low susceptibility to disturbances is derived and an outlook on potential future process monitoring and control by means of microbial indicators is provided.
  • Item
    Respiratory patterns of European pear (Pyrus communis L. ‘Conference’) throughout pre- and post-harvest fruit development
    (London [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2019) Brandes, Nicole; Zude-Sasse, Manuela
    Information on the developmental stage of pear pre-harvest and in shelf-life is crucial to determine the optimum timing of harvest, post-harvest treatment, and time of consumption ensuring high eating quality. In the present study, CO2 emission and fruit quality of European pear (Pyrus communis L.) ‘Conference’ were analysed pre- and post-harvest with emphasis on shelf life for three years. Additionally, cytochrome and cyanide-resistant O2 consumption were analysed in the last year of experiments. The respiration rate of pear showed typical climacteric rise of CO2 emission in two years only, despite daily measurements. However, in each year the fruit quality in shelf life was closely linked to harvest date suggesting climacteric fruit response. Thus, the developmental stage of ‘Conference’ pear should be analysed by additional methods. Particularly, the cytochrome and cyanide-resistant O2 consumption showed an encouraging potential to obtain data on characteristic respiratory patterns. © 2019
  • Item
    N 2 O emissions and NO 3 − leaching from two contrasting regions in Austria and influence of soil, crops and climate: a modelling approach
    (Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 2019) Kasper, M.; Foldal, C.; Kitzler, B.; Haas, E.; Strauss, P.; Eder, A.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.; Amon, B.
    National emission inventories for UN FCCC reporting estimate regional soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes by considering the amount of N input as the only influencing factor for N 2 O emissions. Our aim was to deepen the understanding of N 2 O fluxes from agricultural soils, including region specific soil and climate properties into the estimation of emission to find targeted mitigation measures for the reduction of nitrogen losses and GHG emissions. Within this project, N 2 O emissions and nitrate (NO 3 − ) leaching were modelled under spatially distinct environmental conditions in two agricultural regions in Austria taking into account region specific soil and climatic properties, management practices and crop rotations. The LandscapeDNDC ecosystem model was used to calculate N 2 O emissions and NO 3 − leaching reflecting different types of vegetation, management operations and crop rotations. In addition, N input and N fluxes were assessed and N 2 O emissions were calculated. This approach allowed identifying hot spots of N 2 O emissions. Results show that certain combinations of soil type, weather conditions, crop and management can lead to high emissions. Mean values ranged from 0.15 to 1.29 kg N 2 O–N ha −1  year −1 (Marchfeld) and 0.26 to 0.52 kg N 2 O–N ha −1  year −1 (Grieskirchen). Nitrate leaching, which strongly dominated N-losses, often reacted opposite to N 2 O emissions. Larger quantities of NO 3 − were lost during years of higher precipitation, especially if winter barley was cultivated on sandy soils. Taking into account the detected hot spots of N 2 O emissions and NO 3 − leaching most efficient measures can be addressed to mitigate environmental impacts while maximising crop production. © 2018, The Author(s).