Enhanced pore space analysis by use of μ-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage1225eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage1238eng
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume9eng
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Zeyu
dc.contributor.authorKruschwitz, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorWeller, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorHalisch, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-20T12:23:43Z
dc.date.available2022-04-20T12:23:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the pore space of rock samples with respect to different petrophysical parameters using various methods, which provide data on pore size distributions, including micro computed tomography (μ-CT), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and spectral-induced polarization (SIP). The resulting cumulative distributions of pore volume as a function of pore size are compared. Considering that the methods differ with regard to their limits of resolution, a multiple-length-scale characterization of the pore space is proposed, that is based on a combination of the results from all of these methods. The approach is demonstrated using samples of Bentheimer and Röttbacher sandstone. Additionally, we compare the potential of SIP to provide a pore size distribution with other commonly used methods (MIP, NMR). The limits of resolution of SIP depend on the usable frequency range (between 0.002 and 100 Hz). The methods with similar resolution show a similar behavior of the cumulative pore volume distribution in the overlapping pore size range. We assume that μ-CT and NMR provide the pore body size while MIP and SIP characterize the pore throat size. Our study shows that a good agreement between the pore radius distributions can only be achieved if the curves are adjusted considering the resolution and pore volume in the relevant range of pore radii. The MIP curve with the widest range in resolution should be used as reference.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/8746
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/7784
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherGöttingen : Copernicus Publ.eng
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1225-2018
dc.relation.essn1869-9529
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSolid earth : SE 9 (2018), Nr. 6eng
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unportedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectComputerized tomographyeng
dc.subjectNuclear magnetic resonanceeng
dc.subjectSize distributioneng
dc.subjectCumulative distributioneng
dc.subjectMercury intrusion porosimetryeng
dc.subjectMicrocomputed tomographyeng
dc.subjectNuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)eng
dc.subjectPetrophysical parameterseng
dc.subjectPore radius distributioneng
dc.subjectPore volume distributioneng
dc.subjectSpectral induced polarizationeng
dc.subjectPore sizeeng
dc.subjectgeophysical surveyeng
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonanceeng
dc.subjectpore spaceeng
dc.subjectsandstoneeng
dc.subjectsize distributioneng
dc.subjecttomographyeng
dc.subject.ddc550eng
dc.titleEnhanced pore space analysis by use of μ-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIPeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleSolid earth : SEeng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorLIAGeng
wgl.subjectGeowissenschafteneng
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikeleng
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Enhanced_pore_space_analysis_by_use.pdf
Size:
4.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: